Monte L. Thies

28 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Monte L. Thies
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Ecology 102
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 93
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 44
  • Global and Planetary Change 40
  • Genetics 27
Replace Josimar Ribeiro de Almeida with:
Josimar Ribeiro de Almeida Brazil
Jan Olof Helldin Sweden
Jostein Gohli Norway
Darío Navarrete‐Gutiérrez Mexico
CJR. Alho Brazil
Clive Walker South Africa
Anna Maria De Marinis Italy
Ryan S. Terrill United States
John Wigginton United States
Susana Cárdenas‐Alayza Peru
Monte L. Thies relative to Josimar Ribeiro de Almeida Brazil Josimar Ribeiro de Almeida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Josimar Ribeiro de Almeida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Monte L. Thies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monte L. Thies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monte L. Thies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monte L. Thies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monte L. Thies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monte L. Thies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monte L. Thies. The network helps show where Monte L. Thies may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monte L. Thies

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monte L. Thies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monte L. Thies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Monte L. Thies. Monte L. Thies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 33
4 1
5 5
6 5
7 5
8
Mammals of the Konaka Hills Region in Ngamiland: A Provisional Checklist
1
9
The herpetofauna of Koanaka South and adjacent regions, Ngamiland, Botswana
1
10 33
11 18
12 31
13 1
14 10
15 18
16
Gar ichthyotoxin: Its effect on natural predators and the toxin's evolutionary function
2
17 20
18
The Eastern Harvest Mouse, Reithrodontomys humulis, in Northcentral Oklahoma
1
19 4
20
Notes on the Occurrence of Morphological and Color Aberrations in Bats From Oklahoma, Missouri, and Mexico
23

About Monte L. Thies

Monte L. Thies is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (93 citations), Ecology (102 citations) and Parasitology (24 citations). Monte L. Thies has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include William Caire, Karen McBee, Patrick J. Lewis, Paul E. Drevnick, Aaron M. Bauer, Juan D. Daza, Steven Roels, Chad P. McHugh, Peter C. Melby and Adam W. Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment and American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026