Monika Kraus

447 total citations
8 papers, 50 citations indexed

About

Monika Kraus is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Monika Kraus has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 50 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Monika Kraus's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Health and Medical Studies (2 papers) and Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (2 papers). Monika Kraus is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Health and Medical Studies (2 papers) and Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (2 papers). Monika Kraus collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Italy. Monika Kraus's co-authors include Markus Brielmeier, Kerstin Weitmann, Thea Schwaneberg, Hugo A. Katus, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Claudia Seyler, Andreas Dösch, Thomas Bahls, Peter Ihle and Stefan Lang and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Laboratory Animals.

In The Last Decade

Monika Kraus

5 papers receiving 50 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Monika Kraus Germany	3	19	13	13	12	11	8	50
İbak Gönen Türkiye	4	24 1.3×	3 0.2×	6 0.5×	4 0.3×	14 1.3×	8	52
Cecilia Nieves Canada	7	20 1.1×	26 2.0×	53 4.1×	8 0.7×		15	129
Claire Geoghegan South Africa	3	2 0.1×	11 0.8×	14 1.1×	3 0.3×	8 0.7×	3	41
Kofi Bonney Ghana	4	6 0.3×	44 3.4×	2 0.2×	20 1.7×	3 0.3×	6	59
Susana Sánchez Ramón Spain	4	5 0.3×	21 1.6×	12 0.9×	1 0.1×	10 0.9×	14	76
Cassandra Foster Brazil	3	7 0.4×	6 0.5×	3 0.2×	6 0.5×		4	52
Wander de Jesus Jeremias Brazil	5	13 0.7×	7 0.5×	14 1.1×	14 1.2×		13	90
Ann-Charlotte Karlsson Sweden	2	9 0.5×	12 0.9×	3 0.2×		9 0.8×	2	31
Chaojun Zhou China	4	4 0.2×	6 0.5×	7 0.5×	4 0.3×		6	41
S. Baumard France	5	4 0.2×	19 1.5×	5 0.4×	5 0.4×		7	44

Countries citing papers authored by Monika Kraus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monika Kraus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monika Kraus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monika Kraus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monika Kraus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monika Kraus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monika Kraus. The network helps show where Monika Kraus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monika Kraus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monika Kraus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monika Kraus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Monika Kraus. Monika Kraus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Heim, Edgar, et al.. (2025). The benefits of fully electronic consent management and consent collection via a tablet PC in supporting time-critical pandemic research—an example from a NAPKON COVID-19 project. Frontiers in Digital Health. 7. 1489176–1489176.

Heier, Margit, et al.. (2024). Public attitudes towards personal health data sharing in long-term epidemiological research: a Citizen Science approach in the KORA study. BMC Public Health. 24(1). 2317–2317.

Schmitt, Jochen, Peter Ihle, Olaf Schoffer, et al.. (2024). Datennutzung für eine bessere Gesundheitsversorgung–Plädoyer für eine kooperative Forschungsdatenplattform der gesetzlichen und privaten Krankenversicherung und dem Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin (NUM). Das Gesundheitswesen. 87(S 02). S279–S288.

Lang, Stefan, et al.. (2024). #consented – A semantic consent code to facilitate consistent documentation and implementation of consent in collaborative medical research. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 190. 105545–105545. 1 indexed citations

Krefting, Dagmar, Gabriele Anton, Wolfgang Hoffmann, et al.. (2023). The Importance of Being FAIR and FAST – The Clinical Epidemiology and Study Platform of the German Network University Medicine (NUKLEUS). Studies in health technology and informatics. 302. 93–97. 1 indexed citations

Schwaneberg, Thea, Kerstin Weitmann, Andreas Dösch, et al.. (2017). Data Privacy Management and Data Quality Monitoring in the German Centre for Cardiovascular Research’s multicentre TranslatiOnal Registry for CardiomyopatHies (DZHK-TORCH). ESC Heart Failure. 4(4). 440–447. 8 indexed citations

Kraus, Monika, et al.. (2016). Murine norovirus detection in the exhaust air of IVCs is more sensitive than serological analysis of soiled bedding sentinels. Laboratory Animals. 51(3). 301–310. 36 indexed citations

Compagnone, Christian, Michael E Schatman, Richard Rauck, et al.. (2016). Past, Present, and Future of Informed Consent in Pain and Genomics Research: Challenges Facing Global Medical Community. Pain Practice. 17(1). 8–15. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact