Monica Centa
About
In The Last Decade
Monica Centa
14 papers receiving 187 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Immunology 73
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 70
- Molecular Biology 37
- Epidemiology 36
- Surgery 20
Countries citing papers authored by Monica Centa
This map shows the geographic impact of Monica Centa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monica Centa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monica Centa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Monica Centa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monica Centa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monica Centa. The network helps show where Monica Centa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monica Centa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monica Centa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monica Centa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Monica Centa. Monica Centa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 19 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.