Mohd Usama

736 citations
16 papers · 492 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mohd Usama

14 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Mohd Usama
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Health Information Management 50
  • Artificial Intelligence 249
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 97
  • Neurology 38
  • Oncology 92
Replace Abdulkareem Alzahrani with:
Abdulkareem Alzahrani Saudi Arabia
Ghadah Naif Alwakid Saudi Arabia
Rehan Ashraf Pakistan
Ahmed Abdullah Alqarni Saudi Arabia
Luciano Caroprese Italy
Saqib Qamar China
A. Harshavardhan India
Nizar Alsharif Saudi Arabia
Saeed Iqbal Pakistan
Serkan Savaş Türkiye
Mohd Usama relative to Abdulkareem Alzahrani Saudi Arabia Abdulkareem Alzahrani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Abdulkareem Alzahrani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohd Usama

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohd Usama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohd Usama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohd Usama more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohd Usama

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohd Usama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohd Usama. The network helps show where Mohd Usama may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohd Usama, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohd Usama Line = papers co-authored together Mohd Usama links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202093
2 202092
3 201984
4 201853
5 201943
6 201731
7 201923
8 201821
9 202219
10 202117
11 20196
12 20195
13 20193
14 20251
15 20191
16 20190

About Mohd Usama

Mohd Usama is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Health Information Management, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Neurology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 16 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (4 papers), Topic Modeling (4 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (3 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (3 papers), AI in cancer detection (3 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers) and Text and Document Classification Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (50 citations), Artificial Intelligence (249 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (97 citations), Neurology (38 citations) and Oncology (92 citations). Mohd Usama has collaborated with scholars based in China, Saudi Arabia and India. Frequent co-authors include Belal Ahmad, M. Shamim Hossain, Ghulam Muhammad, Saqib Qamar, Parvez Ahmad, Ran Zheng, Hai Jin, Enmin Song, Mubarak Alrashoud and Kai Hwang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Future Generation Computer Systems, Computer Communications, Computers in Biology and Medicine and International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact