Mohammed Khalil

1.1k citations
40 papers · 513 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mohammed Khalil

38 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Mohammed Khalil
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Signal Processing 94
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 152
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 118
  • Neurology 42
  • Human-Computer Interaction 30
Replace Amine Naït‐Ali with:
Amine Naït‐Ali France
Jordan J. Bird United Kingdom
Mehmet Akif Özdemir Türkiye
Marco Guermandi Italy
Mohammad Mikaeili Iran
Xuehan Wang China
Bertrand Massot France
Ajat Shatru Arora India
Vinay Kumar India
Alam Noor China
Mohammed Khalil relative to Amine Naït‐Ali France Amine Naït‐Ali's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Amine Naït‐Ali · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohammed Khalil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohammed Khalil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohammed Khalil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohammed Khalil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohammed Khalil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohammed Khalil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohammed Khalil. The network helps show where Mohammed Khalil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohammed Khalil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohammed Khalil Line = papers co-authored together Mohammed Khalil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202078
2 200962
3 202043
4 201839
5 202132
6 202024
7 201824
8 201420
9 202117
10 201916
11 202216
12 201414
13 201811
14 201710
15 201710
16 20149
17 20209
18 20129
19 20197
20 20176

About Mohammed Khalil

Mohammed Khalil is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 40 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (12 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (11 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (9 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (7 papers), Digital Media Forensic Detection (6 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (5 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (94 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (152 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (118 citations), Neurology (42 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations). Mohammed Khalil has collaborated with scholars based in Morocco, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Abdellah Adib, Siba K. Samal, Kenneth C. Earhart, Baibaswata Nayak, Sachin Kumar, Peter L. Collins, Daniel R. Pérez, Matthew H. G. Katz, Robert A. Wolff and Naveen Garg. Their work appears in journals such as Multimedia Tools and Applications, Neurocomputing, PLoS ONE, Digital Signal Processing and Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact