Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Mohammad Moghiman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mohammad Moghiman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohammad Moghiman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohammad Moghiman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mohammad Moghiman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohammad Moghiman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohammad Moghiman. The network helps show where Mohammad Moghiman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mohammad Moghiman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mohammad Moghiman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mohammad Moghiman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mohammad Moghiman. Mohammad Moghiman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Javadi, Mohammad, et al.. (2012). Investigation of Sour Natural Gas Decomposition in a Nozzle-type Solar Reactor for Hydrogen Production. 9(1). 40–49.
9.
Saeedi, Ali, et al.. (2012). EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE INLET AIR SWIRL ANGLE EFFECTS ON TEMPERATURE PROFILE AND CO, NO POLLUTANTS. 2(1). 32–39.1 indexed citations
10.
Javadi, Mohammad, et al.. (2011). Experimental Investigation of Natural Gas Fuel Preheating Effects on the Flame Luminosity and NO Emission. 3.1 indexed citations
Vaezi, Mahdi, et al.. (2008). ON A NUMERICAL MODEL FOR GASIFICATION OF BIOMASS MATERIALS: AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO COMBUSTION. 1(1). 1–8.3 indexed citations
Moghiman, Mohammad & Iman Zahmatkesh. (2007). An investigation of soot formation and combustion in turbulent spray flames. 34. 183–202.4 indexed citations
15.
Moghiman, Mohammad. (2007). Experimental and numerical studies of carbon black natural gas furnace.
16.
Bashirnezhad, Kazem, Mohammad Moghiman, & Seyed Latif Mousavi Gargari. (2006). On the Dependence of Soot formation and Combustion on swirling combustion Furnaces: Measurement and Simulation. 3(4). 205–212.1 indexed citations
17.
Zahmatkesh, Iman & Mohammad Moghiman. (2006). On the Suitability of Soot Formation Models in Turbulent Flames: A Comparison Study. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER].1 indexed citations
18.
Zahmatkesh, Iman & Mohammad Moghiman. (2006). Effect of liquid fuel droplet size on soot emission from turbulent spray flames. 30(3). 339–351.5 indexed citations
19.
Moghiman, Mohammad. (2003). Numerical Prediction and Measurement of Carbon Black Through Turbulent Combustion and Decomposition of Natural Gas. Scientia Iranica. 10(2). 211–219.3 indexed citations
20.
Moghiman, Mohammad, et al.. (2001). On the dependence of spray evaporation and combustion on atomization techniques. 25(2). 241–252.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.