Mohamed Benaida
- Information Systems top 5%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tanweer AlamShamimul QamarAmit Rai DixitAbdallah NamounArif UllahTarek SheltamiM. AbdeenMohammed Al-Shargabi
- Topics
- IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (7 papers)Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (7 papers)Internet of Things and AI (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- Saudi ArabiaIndiaBelgium
In The Last Decade
Mohamed Benaida
25 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Information Systems 129
- Computer Networks and Communications 92
- Artificial Intelligence 50
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 39
- Computer Science Applications 26
Countries citing papers authored by Mohamed Benaida
This map shows the geographic impact of Mohamed Benaida's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohamed Benaida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohamed Benaida more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mohamed Benaida
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohamed Benaida. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohamed Benaida. The network helps show where Mohamed Benaida may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mohamed Benaida
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mohamed Benaida. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mohamed Benaida based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mohamed Benaida. Mohamed Benaida is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | An Exploratory Study of the Factors Affecting the Perceived Usability of Algerian Educational Websites. | 11 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Mohamed Benaida
Mohamed Benaida is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Information Systems and Computer Science Applications, having authored 27 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (7 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (7 papers) and Internet of Things and AI (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (129 citations), Computer Science Applications (26 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (92 citations). Mohamed Benaida has collaborated with scholars based in Saudi Arabia, India and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Tanweer Alam, Shamimul Qamar, Amit Rai Dixit, Abdallah Namoun, Arif Ullah, Tarek Sheltami, M. Abdeen, Mohammed Al-Shargabi, Ahmad B. Alkhodre and Ansar-Ul-Haque Yasar. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Sustainability and Soft Computing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.