Mohamad Khaled

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 890 citations indexed

About

Mohamad Khaled is a scholar working on Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mohamad Khaled has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 890 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Neurology, 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mohamad Khaled's work include Neurological disorders and treatments (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (3 papers). Mohamad Khaled is often cited by papers focused on Neurological disorders and treatments (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (3 papers). Mohamad Khaled collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Mohamad Khaled's co-authors include Robert C. Frysinger, Max Wintermark, Stephen J. Monteith, Diane Huss, Binit Shah, Johanna Loomba, T. Jason Druzgal, Eyal Zadicario, Scott A. Wylie and Scott A. Sperling and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of neurosurgery and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Mohamad Khaled

7 papers receiving 876 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Pilot Study of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor

2013 650 citations W. Jeffrey Elias, Diane Huss et al. New England Journal of Medicine profile →

Peers

Mohamad Khaled

RNMI

BE

NEURO

CMN

MC

John Snell United States

Diane Huss United States

Marta del Álamo Spain

Matthew Eames United States

Greg Hrdlicka United States

Priya Bansal United States

Neekita Jikaria United States

Gilat Schiff Israel

Michael Finsterwald Switzerland

Yangzi Qiao China

John Snell United States

Mohamad Khaled

619 ×1.1

RNMI

628 ×1.3

BE

210 ×0.5

NEURO

81 ×0.4

CMN

75 ×1.0

MC

Citations per year, relative to Mohamad Khaled Mohamad Khaled (= 1×) peers John Snell

Countries citing papers authored by Mohamad Khaled

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohamad Khaled's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohamad Khaled with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohamad Khaled more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohamad Khaled

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohamad Khaled. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohamad Khaled. The network helps show where Mohamad Khaled may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mohamad Khaled

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mohamad Khaled. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mohamad Khaled based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mohamad Khaled. Mohamad Khaled is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Eames, Matthew, Mohamad Khaled, W. Jeff Elias, et al.. (2015). Head phantoms for transcranial focused ultrasound. Medical Physics. 42(4). 1518–1527. 17 indexed citations

2.

Dallapiazza, Robert F., Mohamad Khaled, Matthew Eames, et al.. (2015). Feasibility and Safety of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Lesioning in the Setting of Deep Brain Stimulation. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. 93(2). 140–146. 3 indexed citations

3.

Elias, W. Jeffrey, Diane Huss, Tiffini Voss, et al.. (2013). A Pilot Study of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor. New England Journal of Medicine. 369(7). 640–648. 650 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Wintermark, Max, T. Jason Druzgal, Diane Huss, et al.. (2013). Imaging Findings in MR Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound Treatment for Patients with Essential Tremor. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 35(5). 891–896. 121 indexed citations

5.

Elias, W. Jeff, Diane Huss, Tiffini Voss, et al.. (2013). The use of magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound to treat essential tremor. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 134(5_Supplement). 4090–4090. 2 indexed citations

6.

Elias, W. Jeff, Mohamad Khaled, Justin D. Hilliard, et al.. (2013). A magnetic resonance imaging, histological, and dose modeling comparison of focused ultrasound, radiofrequency, and Gamma Knife radiosurgery lesions in swine thalamus. Journal of neurosurgery. 119(2). 307–317. 76 indexed citations

7.

Yen, Chun‐Po, et al.. (2010). Early Draining Vein Occlusion After Gamma Knife Surgery for Arteriovenous Malformations. Neurosurgery. 67(5). 1293–1302. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact