Moe Bergman

1.1k citations
42 papers · 824 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Moe Bergman

39 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers

Moe Bergman
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Sensory Systems 366
  • Speech and Hearing 246
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 491
  • Otorhinolaryngology 102
  • Neurology 154
Replace Jay W. Sanders with:
Jay W. Sanders United States
L. Clarke Cox United States
Hasso von Wedel Germany
Rose Chmiel United States
T S Tweed United States
Anders Ringdahl Sweden
Robert W. Sweetow United States
Orozimbo Alves Costa Filho Brazil
Kristin Daemers Belgium
Martin Walger Germany
Moe Bergman relative to Jay W. Sanders United States Jay W. Sanders's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jay W. Sanders · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Moe Bergman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Moe Bergman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moe Bergman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moe Bergman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Moe Bergman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moe Bergman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moe Bergman. The network helps show where Moe Bergman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Moe Bergman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Moe Bergman Line = papers co-authored together Moe Bergman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20061
2 19960
3 199210
4 19884
5
Interhemispheric suppression: a test of central auditory function.
198711
6 198710
7 19872
8
The Word Retrieval Fluency Test: what does it assess?
19857
9 19851
10 198410
11
Aging and the perception of speech
198069
12
Tests of auditory perception in the assessment and management of patients with cerebral cranial injury.
19772
13 197674
14 197113
15
Speech pathology and audiology in Israel.
19712
16 196923
17 19641
18 19595
19 195532
20 19512

About Moe Bergman

Moe Bergman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing, Sensory Systems and Music, having authored 42 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (366 citations), Speech and Hearing (246 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (491 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (102 citations) and Neurology (154 citations). Moe Bergman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Rosen, D. Plester, Harry Levitt, P Solzi, Hanan Costeff, I. Rapin, Liat Kishon‐Rabin, Ervin Ostfeld, Isaac Schechter and Daniel Rosenblatt. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Ear and Hearing, The Laryngoscope, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026