M.J. Reed

14 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

M.J. Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 68
  • Geophysics 137
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 128
  • Environmental Engineering 96
  • Pollution 46
Replace Dai Ta-gen with:
Dai Ta-gen China
Kasumi Yasukawa Japan
Haonan Gan China
D. H. Root United States
Adedibu Sunny Akingboye Nigeria
Stefan Kranz Germany
David M. Sutphin United States
Omar Assowe Dabar France
M.J. Reed relative to Dai Ta-gen China Dai Ta-gen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Dai Ta-gen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.J. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.J. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.J. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.J. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.J. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.J. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.J. Reed. The network helps show where M.J. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside M.J. Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.J. Reed Line = papers co-authored together M.J. Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200090
2 200886
3 200863
4 201354
5 198331
6
Quantifying the Undiscovered Geothermal Resources of the United States
200912
7 19899
8 19937
9
Geothermometer calculations for geothermal assessment
20075
10 19925
11
Quality control of chemical and isotopic analyses of geothermal water samples
19914
12
Outstanding issues for new geothermal resource assessments
20054
13
The USGS national geothermal resource assessment: An update
20074
14 19811
15 19821
16 19831
17
Geochemical comparison of deep geothermal waters in North America
19770

About M.J. Reed

M.J. Reed is a scholar working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Geochemistry and Petrology, Artificial Intelligence, Mechanics of Materials and Ocean Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (6 papers), Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications (6 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (5 papers), Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (5 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (2 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (2 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (2 papers) and Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (68 citations), Geophysics (137 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (128 citations), Environmental Engineering (96 citations) and Pollution (46 citations). M.J. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Colin F. Williams, R.H. Mariner, Philip A. Candela, Philip M. Piccoli, S.P. Galanis, Andrew J. McAloon, Daniel K. Y. Solaiman, Winnie Yee, Richard D. Ashby and J. N. Grossman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, Energy Sources, Geothermics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms and Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact