M.J. Denham

68 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

M.J. Denham
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 140
  • Family Practice 39
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 19
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 154
Replace Barbara J. Messinger‐Rapport with:
Barbara J. Messinger‐Rapport United States
Dirk Ramaekers Belgium
Scott Garrison Canada
Valerie Durkalski United States
Navindra Persaud Canada
Shahrul Bahyah Kamaruzzaman Malaysia
Antoine Piau France
Steven C. Bagley United States
James C. Fackler United States
M.J. Denham relative to Barbara J. Messinger‐Rapport United States Barbara J. Messinger‐Rapport's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Barbara J. Messinger‐Rapport · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.J. Denham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.J. Denham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.J. Denham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.J. Denham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.J. Denham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.J. Denham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.J. Denham. The network helps show where M.J. Denham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.J. Denham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.J. Denham Line = papers co-authored together M.J. Denham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199786
2 200569
3 200355
4 200043
5 200633
6 199030
7 198029
8 200626
9 198725
10 197924
11 197723
12 199522
13 197720
14 199817
15 198817
16 197317
17 198816
18 198814
19 197314
20 198713

About M.J. Denham

M.J. Denham is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 81 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (140 citations), Family Practice (39 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (19 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (154 citations). M.J. Denham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Sally‐Anne Francis, Nina Barnett, Roman Borisyuk, Felicity Smith, Nicola J. Gray, H. M. HODKINSON, Jonathan Graffy, D. A. J. Tyrrell, Sylvia M. Dobbs and R. John Dobbs. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, International Journal of Control, Health & Social Care in the Community and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact