899 total citations 52 papers, 164 citations indexed
About
Mischa Meier is a scholar working on Classics, History and Anthropology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Mischa Meier has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 164 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Classics, 19 papers in History and 17 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Mischa Meier's work include Byzantine Studies and History (22 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (16 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers). Mischa Meier is often cited by papers focused on Byzantine Studies and History (22 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (16 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers). Mischa Meier collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Mischa Meier's co-authors include Claus Meier-Brook, Dennis J. Schmidt and Juris J. Meier and has published in prestigious journals such as Parasitology Research, Historical social research and Early Medieval Europe.
In The Last Decade
Mischa Meier
32 papers
receiving
119 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mischa Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mischa Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mischa Meier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mischa Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mischa Meier. The network helps show where Mischa Meier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mischa Meier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mischa Meier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mischa Meier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mischa Meier. Mischa Meier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Meier, Mischa, et al.. (2010). August 410-ein Kampf um Rom. Klett-Cotta eBooks.1 indexed citations
8.
Meier, Mischa, et al.. (2010). Zwischen Monarchie und Republik : Gesellschaftliche Stabilisierungsleistungen und politische Transformationspotentiale in den antiken Stadtstaaten. F. Steiner eBooks.
9.
Meier, Mischa. (2009). Anastasios I : die Entstehung des Byzantinischen Reiches. Klett-Cotta eBooks.5 indexed citations
10.
Meier, Mischa. (2007). Sie schufen Europa : historische Portraits von Konstantin bis Karl dem Großen. C.H.Beck eBooks.1 indexed citations
11.
Meier, Mischa. (2007). Naturkatastrophen in der christlichen Chronistik. Das beispiel Johannes Malalas (6. Jh.). 114(6). 559–586.
Meier, Mischa. (2004). Zur Funktion der Theodora-Rede im geschichtswerk Prokops (BP 1,24,33-37). Rheinisches Museum für Philologie. 147(1). 88–104.2 indexed citations
Meier, Juris J. & Mischa Meier. (2002). [Description of diabetes by Aretaios von Kappadokien. A miserable, difficult life].. PubMed. 144(47). 68–9.
20.
Meier, Mischa. (1999). Der Tod des Archytas. Eine Bemerkung zu Horaz, carmen I 28. 106(3). 193–208.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.