Mireille Lavoie

22 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Mireille Lavoie
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 212
  • General Health Professions 158
  • Clinical Psychology 88
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 34
Replace Maria Emília Limeira Lopes with:
Maria Emília Limeira Lopes Brazil
Karen Gillett United Kingdom
Ann Begley United Kingdom
Katherine Brown‐Saltzman United States
Joyce M. Shea United States
Haley Buller United States
Louise de Raeve United Kingdom
Pauline Catherine Gillan Australia
Linda Gerson United States
Bob Wright United Kingdom
Mireille Lavoie relative to Maria Emília Limeira Lopes Brazil Maria Emília Limeira Lopes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Maria Emília Limeira Lopes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mireille Lavoie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mireille Lavoie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mireille Lavoie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mireille Lavoie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mireille Lavoie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mireille Lavoie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mireille Lavoie. The network helps show where Mireille Lavoie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mireille Lavoie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mireille Lavoie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mireille Lavoie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mireille Lavoie. Mireille Lavoie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 2
3 2
4 23
5
[From humanism to nihilism: dialectics on Jean Watson's caring theory].
2
6 26
7 27
8 4
9 17
10 24
11
L'expérience de l'espoir vécue par des enfants atteints d'un cancer
1
12 9
13 0
14 15
15 3
16 35
17 18
18 7
19 40
20
The status of birth certificate information in Georgia.
5

About Mireille Lavoie

Mireille Lavoie is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (9 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (212 citations) and Research and Theory (6 citations). Mireille Lavoie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Danielle Blondeau, Isabelle Martineau, Paweł Król, Lydi‐Anne Vézina‐Im, Gaston Godin, Pierre Valois, Edward W. Keyserlingk, Marc Hébert, Louis Roy and Jacqueline Fawcett. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Journal of Medical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026