Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Salmonella spp. infection – a continuous threat worldwide
2021168 citationsG Popa, Mircea Ioan Popaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mircea Ioan Popa
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mircea Ioan Popa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mircea Ioan Popa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mircea Ioan Popa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mircea Ioan Popa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mircea Ioan Popa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mircea Ioan Popa. The network helps show where Mircea Ioan Popa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mircea Ioan Popa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mircea Ioan Popa.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mircea Ioan Popa based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mircea Ioan Popa. Mircea Ioan Popa is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mihai, Mara Mădălina, Alina Maria Holban, Marius Nicolae Popescu, et al.. (2024). Host–Microbiome Crosstalk in Chronic Wound Healing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 25(9). 4629–4629.11 indexed citations
Popa, Mircea Ioan, et al.. (2020). Pseudo-Contraband. Controversial Issues Regarding the Interpretation of the Smuggling Offense. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Mitran, Cristina Iulia, et al.. (2018). Resistance pattern of multi-drug resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and characteristics of patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.. PubMed. 75(1-2). 25–31.2 indexed citations
12.
Popa, Mircea Ioan, et al.. (2017). Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae – overview and importance.2 indexed citations
13.
Mitran, Cristina Iulia, Mădălina Irina Mitran, Mircea Tampa, et al.. (2016). Mecanisme de rezistenţă a tulpinilor de Mycobacterium tuberculosis.1 indexed citations
14.
Preda, Mădălina, et al.. (2016). Sensibilitatea la antibiotice și chimioterapice a microorganismelor izolate de la pacienţi cu afecţiuni bronhopulmonare, în Institutul „Marius Nasta“, în 2015.1 indexed citations
15.
Preda, Mădălina, et al.. (2016). Infecţii intestinale ale epocii moderne: diareea călătorului din perspectiva medicinei preventive.1 indexed citations
Mihai, Mara Mădălina, Călin Giurcăneanu, Liliana Gabriela Popa, Cornelia Niţipir, & Mircea Ioan Popa. (2015). Controversies and challenges of chronic wound infection diagnosis and treatment. Medicina Moderna - Modern Medicine. 22(4).5 indexed citations
Popa, Mircea Ioan, et al.. (2008). CYSTIC FIBROSIS AND COELIAC DISEASE. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 93.1 indexed citations
20.
Popa, Mircea Ioan, Martin Schwarz, G. Hambleton, et al.. (1997). Cystic fibrosis mutations in Romania. European Journal of Pediatrics. 156(3). 212–213.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.