Miranda L. van Hooff
- Surgery top 5%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Maarten SpruitMarinus de KleuverJacques van LimbeekJeremy FairbankRaymond OsteloWilco JacobsGijs G. van HellemondtAnne F. Mannion
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (30 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (26 papers)Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Miranda L. van Hooff
58 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Surgery 584
- Pharmacology 466
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 463
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 120
- Economics and Econometrics 108
Countries citing papers authored by Miranda L. van Hooff
This map shows the geographic impact of Miranda L. van Hooff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miranda L. van Hooff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miranda L. van Hooff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miranda L. van Hooff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miranda L. van Hooff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miranda L. van Hooff. The network helps show where Miranda L. van Hooff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miranda L. van Hooff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miranda L. van Hooff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miranda L. van Hooff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miranda L. van Hooff. Miranda L. van Hooff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 58 | |
| 19 | 85 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About Miranda L. van Hooff
Miranda L. van Hooff is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Health Informatics, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (30 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (26 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (466 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (463 citations) and Surgery (584 citations). Miranda L. van Hooff has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Maarten Spruit, Marinus de Kleuver, Jacques van Limbeek, Jeremy Fairbank, Raymond Ostelo, Wilco Jacobs, Gijs G. van Hellemondt, Anne F. Mannion, Sayf S. A. Faraj and Lukas Staub. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.