Minna Li

1.0k citations
27 papers · 901 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Minna Li

27 papers receiving 891 citations

Peers

Minna Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Water Science and Technology 243
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 204
  • Spectroscopy 129
  • Electrochemistry 47
  • Analytical Chemistry 73
Replace Reem Shah with:
Reem Shah Saudi Arabia
Xudong Jin China
Kholood Alkhamis Saudi Arabia
Hılmı Namlı Türkiye
Hongmei Yu China
Junqing Jiang China
Lingling Qu China
Zenixole R. Tshentu South Africa
Zhu-Qing Gao China
Lutfullah India
Minna Li relative to Reem Shah Saudi Arabia Reem Shah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Reem Shah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Minna Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minna Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minna Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minna Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minna Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minna Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minna Li. The network helps show where Minna Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Minna Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Minna Li Line = papers co-authored together Minna Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020241
2 201064
3 201860
4 201753
5 201949
6 202040
7 201339
8 201935
9 201034
10 200834
11 202029
12 200828
13 202023
14 200722
15 202121
16 200619
17 202016
18 200915
19 201515
20 200714

About Minna Li

Minna Li is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Oncology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (7 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (6 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (5 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (4 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (4 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (3 papers), Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (3 papers) and Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (243 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (204 citations), Spectroscopy (129 citations), Electrochemistry (47 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (73 citations). Minna Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lincheng Zhou, Desheng Liu, Ping Sun, Fujun Ren, Xiaochun Li, Per Lincoln, Zheng Huang, Frida Svensson, Qiong Wu and Maria Matson Dzebo. Their work appears in journals such as Dyes and Pigments, Dalton Transactions, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Cancer Cell International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact