This map shows the geographic impact of Minh Tang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minh Tang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minh Tang more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minh Tang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minh Tang. The network helps show where Minh Tang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Minh Tang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Minh Tang.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Minh Tang based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Minh Tang. Minh Tang is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Athreya, Avanti, Donniell E. Fishkind, Minh Tang, et al.. (2018). Statistical inference on random dot product graphs: a survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 18(226). 1–92.47 indexed citations
5.
Vogelstein, Joshua T, Eric Bridgeford, Minh Tang, et al.. (2017). Geometric Dimensionality Reduction for Subsequent Classification. arXiv (Cornell University).
6.
Levin, Keith, Avanti Athreya, Minh Tang, Vince Lyzinski, & Carey E. Priebe. (2017). A central limit theorem for an omnibus embedding of random dot product graphs. arXiv (Cornell University).3 indexed citations
7.
Vogelstein, Joshua T, Minh Tang, Da Zheng, Randal Burns, & Mauro Maggioni. (2017). Linear Optimal Low Rank Projection for High-Dimensional Multi-class Data. arXiv (Cornell University).
8.
Rubin‐Delanchy, Patrick, Carey E. Priebe, & Minh Tang. (2017). The generalised random dot product graph. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Athreya, Avanti, Vince Lyzinski, David J. Marchette, et al.. (2013). A limit theorem for scaled eigenvectors of random dot product graphs. arXiv (Cornell University).3 indexed citations
Sussman, Daniel L., Minh Tang, Donniell E. Fishkind, & Carey E. Priebe. (2011). A consistent dot product embedding for stochastic blockmodel graphs. arXiv (Cornell University).5 indexed citations
14.
Tang, Minh, et al.. (2009). Corneal Topography and Power Measurement With Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 5791–5791.1 indexed citations
15.
Schallhorn, Julie M., et al.. (2008). Corneal Refractive Index Changes in Keratoconus. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 4345–4345.
16.
Tang, Minh, et al.. (2008). Differential Diagnosis of Eccentric Corneal Steepening After Hyperopic LASIK by Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 2810–2810.
17.
Huang, David T. & Minh Tang. (2008). Corneal Power Measurement With Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 3267–3267.1 indexed citations
Tang, Minh, et al.. (2006). Corneal Power Change After LASIK Accessed by High–Speed Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 583–583.1 indexed citations
20.
Tang, Minh, et al.. (2004). Variants of A* for planning. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1095–1096.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.