Min‐gu Kim

1.4k citations
48 papers · 853 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Min‐gu Kim

44 papers receiving 844 citations

Peers

Min‐gu Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Biomedical Engineering 625
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 202
  • Polymers and Plastics 121
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 53
  • Bioengineering 42
Replace Huayu Luo with:
Huayu Luo China
Heting Wu China
Yun Liang China
Kyoungho Ha South Korea
Chuchu Zhang China
Zhixin Wang China
Sung‐Hun Ha South Korea
Siyuan Yao China
Min‐gu Kim relative to Huayu Luo China Huayu Luo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×101×
Huayu Luo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Min‐gu Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Min‐gu Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min‐gu Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min‐gu Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Min‐gu Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min‐gu Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min‐gu Kim. The network helps show where Min‐gu Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Min‐gu Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Min‐gu Kim Line = papers co-authored together Min‐gu Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020143
2 2016116
3 202092
4 202076
5 201871
6 201245
7 201744
8 201836
9 202125
10 202220
11 201918
12 202112
13 202212
14 202311
15 202311
16 201610
17 20129
18 20109
19 20248
20 20248

About Min‐gu Kim

Min‐gu Kim is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (23 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (4 papers) and 2D Materials and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (625 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (202 citations), Polymers and Plastics (121 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (53 citations) and Bioengineering (42 citations). Min‐gu Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Brand, Devin K. Brown, Spyridon Pavlidis, Zhenan Bao, Yasser Khan, Vivian R. Feig, Joong-Kyoung Kim, Pyungwoo Yeon, Jayoung Kim and Young Tack Lee. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Sensors Journal, Advanced Materials Technologies, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, ACS Nano and Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact