Ming-Ting Wu

2.1k citations
59 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Ming-Ting Wu

54 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Ming-Ting Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 319
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 435
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 373
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 172
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 214
Replace Thomas F. Floyd with:
Thomas F. Floyd United States
Juli Alonso Spain
Jane A. Kent United States
George P. Topulos United States
Hans Klose Germany
Dan G. Pavel United States
John Rees United Kingdom
Craig A. Hamilton United States
Ignasi Carrió Spain
Howard Thompson United States
Ming-Ting Wu relative to Thomas F. Floyd United States Thomas F. Floyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Thomas F. Floyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Ting Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Ting Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Ting Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Ting Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Ting Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Ting Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Ting Wu. The network helps show where Ming-Ting Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Ting Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Ting Wu Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Ting Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999341
2 2006206
3 200995
4 201168
5 200259
6 199457
7 199455
8 201446
9 201344
10 202041
11 200540
12 200438
13 199938
14 201337
15 200532
16 201631
17 201030
18 200726
19 202025
20 199424

About Ming-Ting Wu

Ming-Ting Wu is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (11 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (8 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (5 papers) and Vascular Procedures and Complications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (319 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (435 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (373 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (172 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (214 citations). Ming-Ting Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kuan-Rau Chiou, Guochuan Tsai, Chien‐Fang Yang, Chien-Fang Yang, Raymond J. Bemish, Fu‐Zong Wu, Jen‐Chuen Hsieh, Bruce R. Rosen, Jing Xiong and Kenneth K. Kwong. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Korean Journal of Radiology, QJM and American Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact