Ming‐Ling Yang

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Ming‐Ling Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Pharmacology 165
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 134
  • Immunology 247
  • Neurology 82
  • Pharmacology 141
Replace Jiangzheng Liu with:
Jiangzheng Liu China
Po-Lin Kuo Taiwan
Hyun Hwangbo South Korea
Hongming Lv China
Xinxin Ci China
Hongming Lv China
Chong‐Kuei Lii Taiwan
Manal A. Alfwuaires Saudi Arabia
Sun Woo Jin South Korea
Ming‐Ling Yang relative to Jiangzheng Liu China Jiangzheng Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jiangzheng Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Ling Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Ling Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Ling Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Ling Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Ling Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Ling Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Ling Yang. The network helps show where Ming‐Ling Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Ling Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Ling Yang Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Ling Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014188
2 2011131
3 201271
4 201169
5 201461
6 201859
7 201751
8 201949
9 201346
10 201741
11 201639
12 201835
13 201435
14 201628
15 201328
16 201827
17 201524
18 202119
19 201913
20 201112

About Ming‐Ling Yang

Ming‐Ling Yang is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Neurology and Pharmacology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Response and Inflammation (5 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (4 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), Inflammation biomarkers and pathways (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Inflammasome and immune disorders (3 papers), Flavonoids in Medical Research (3 papers) and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (165 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (134 citations), Immunology (247 citations), Neurology (82 citations) and Pharmacology (141 citations). Ming‐Ling Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yu‐Hsiang Kuan, Yi-Ching Li, Chung‐Hsin Yeh, Shiuan‐Shinn Lee, Jiann‐Jou Yang, Chien‐Ying Lee, Yung‐Chyuan Ho, Ruey‐Hseng Lin, Chun‐Jung Chen and Fong‐Lin Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Toxicology, Toxicology and Industrial Health, Food and Chemical Toxicology, International Immunopharmacology and Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact