Ming‐Kung Wu

54 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Ming‐Kung Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Biological Psychiatry 96
  • Nephrology 131
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 58
  • Parasitology 86
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 89
Replace William F. Kelly with:
William F. Kelly United States
Marie‐Pierre F. Strippoli Switzerland
F Copello Italy
Ophélia Godin France
A. Bootsma–van der Wiel Netherlands
Steve Berman United States
Elizabeth Jackson United States
Stefan Sillau United States
Yun‐Ju Lai Taiwan
Haiying Zhang China
Ming‐Kung Wu relative to William F. Kelly United States William F. Kelly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
William F. Kelly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Kung Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Kung Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Kung Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Kung Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Kung Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Kung Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Kung Wu. The network helps show where Ming‐Kung Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Kung Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Kung Wu Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Kung Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011171
2 2006101
3 201896
4 201364
5 201964
6 201545
7 202143
8 201440
9 201639
10 201631
11 202129
12 202125
13 201622
14 201822
15 202121
16 201820
17 202020
18 202218
19 201617
20 202215

About Ming‐Kung Wu

Ming‐Kung Wu is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Epidemiology, Biological Psychiatry and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (96 citations), Nephrology (131 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (58 citations), Parasitology (86 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (89 citations). Ming‐Kung Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Ping‐Tao Tseng, I‐Wen Wu, C. J. Tsai, Yen‐Wen Chen, Pao‐Yen Lin, Chiao‐Yin Sun, Kuang‐Hung Hsu, Ching-Kuan Wu, Cheng‐Chia Lee and Yi-Yung Hung. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Scientific Reports, Neural Plasticity and Postgraduate Medical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact