Ming Gong
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Cancer Research
- Topics
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (29 papers)Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (22 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (12 papers)
- Cited by
- Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsJournal of Bacteriology
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Ming Gong
56 papers receiving 763 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 428
- Molecular Biology 241
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 236
- Surgery 132
- Cancer Research 90
Countries citing papers authored by Ming Gong
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Gong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Gong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Gong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Gong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Gong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Gong. The network helps show where Ming Gong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming Gong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming Gong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming Gong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming Gong. Ming Gong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Ming Gong
Ming Gong is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 60 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (29 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (22 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (428 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (236 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (42 citations). Ming Gong has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hongjia Zhang, Charles Yanofsky, Luis R. Cruz-Vera, Hongjia Zhang, Jiachen Li, Feng Lan, Ou Liu, Lin Cai, Yuyong Liu and Yongmin Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Journal of Bacteriology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.