Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis
2020455 citationsAnnechien E. G. Haarman, Clair A. Enthoven et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Milly S. Tedja
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Milly S. Tedja's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Milly S. Tedja with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Milly S. Tedja more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Milly S. Tedja. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Milly S. Tedja. The network helps show where Milly S. Tedja may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Milly S. Tedja
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Milly S. Tedja.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Milly S. Tedja based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Milly S. Tedja. Milly S. Tedja is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Haarman, Annechien E. G., Milly S. Tedja, Virginie J. M. Verhoeven, & Caroline C. W. Klaver. (2022). Genetics of myopia: Gene finding and beyond. Acta Ophthalmologica. 100(S275).
Tedja, Milly S., et al.. (2020). Many roads lead to Rome: molecular pathways leading to high myopia. Acta Ophthalmologica. 98. 23–23.1 indexed citations
Haarman, Annechien E. G., Clair A. Enthoven, J. Willem L. Tideman, et al.. (2020). The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 61(4). 49–49.455 indexed citations breakdown →
Tedja, Milly S., Annechien E. G. Haarman, Magda A. Meester‐Smoor, et al.. (2019). IMI – Myopia Genetics Report. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(3). M89–M89.183 indexed citations
13.
Klaver, Caroline C. W., Milly S. Tedja, Xikun Han, et al.. (2019). Genetic risk scores of the largest multi-trait GWAS meta-analysis on refractive errors. 60(9). 3143–3143.1 indexed citations
14.
Verhoeven, Virginie J. M., Adriana I. Iglesias, Milly S. Tedja, et al.. (2017). Newly identified genes for refractive error and risk of myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 181–181.2 indexed citations
15.
Tedja, Milly S., Robert Wojciechowski, Pirro G. Hysi, et al.. (2017). Light processing and regulators are important mechanisms in refractive error. 58(8). 1225–1225.3 indexed citations
16.
Hysi, Pirro G., Virginie J. M. Verhoeven, Robert Wojciechowski, et al.. (2016). Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Novel Genes Associated with High Myopia in the General Population. 57(12).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.