Miles Richardson

8.2k total citations · 3 hit papers
98 papers, 5.1k citations indexed

About

Miles Richardson is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Social Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Miles Richardson has authored 98 papers receiving a total of 5.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 34 papers in Social Psychology and 27 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Miles Richardson's work include Urban Green Space and Health (57 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (27 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (24 papers). Miles Richardson is often cited by papers focused on Urban Green Space and Health (57 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (27 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (24 papers). Miles Richardson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Miles Richardson's co-authors include David Sheffield, Kirsten McEwan, Ryan Lumber, Mathew P. White, Anne Hunt, Gary Jones, Sabine Pahl, Leanne Martin, Iain Hamlin and Alex Hunt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and IEEE Access.

In The Last Decade

Miles Richardson

94 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Hit Papers

Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations wit... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2020 2019 2017 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Miles Richardson United Kingdom 37 2.7k 1.6k 1.2k 1.1k 556 98 5.1k
Elizabeth K. Nisbet Canada 12 2.2k 0.8× 1.4k 0.9× 1.4k 1.2× 835 0.7× 334 0.6× 16 3.6k
Peter H. Kahn United States 40 2.0k 0.7× 2.7k 1.7× 976 0.8× 1.2k 1.0× 532 1.0× 117 6.2k
Lincoln R. Larson United States 38 2.2k 0.8× 1.6k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 1.6k 1.4× 1.0k 1.9× 160 5.7k
Cynthia McPherson Frantz United States 14 1.8k 0.7× 1.6k 1.0× 1.7k 1.4× 1.3k 1.1× 255 0.5× 26 4.0k
Giuseppe Carrus Italy 36 2.2k 0.8× 767 0.5× 1.6k 1.3× 1.4k 1.3× 1.1k 2.0× 110 5.0k
Henk Staats Netherlands 26 2.1k 0.8× 878 0.5× 1.7k 1.4× 1.2k 1.0× 678 1.2× 47 4.8k
F. Stephan Mayer United States 11 1.8k 0.7× 1.3k 0.8× 1.6k 1.3× 1.0k 0.9× 246 0.4× 14 3.5k
Birgitta Gatersleben United Kingdom 34 2.0k 0.7× 822 0.5× 1.6k 1.3× 1.1k 1.0× 496 0.9× 97 5.8k
John M. Zelenski Canada 29 3.0k 1.1× 2.8k 1.7× 1.9k 1.5× 1.6k 1.4× 472 0.8× 62 6.7k
Myron F. Floyd United States 46 2.8k 1.0× 2.5k 1.5× 583 0.5× 2.6k 2.3× 771 1.4× 116 7.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Miles Richardson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miles Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles Richardson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miles Richardson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles Richardson. The network helps show where Miles Richardson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miles Richardson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miles Richardson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miles Richardson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miles Richardson. Miles Richardson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Passmore, Holli‐Anne, et al.. (2025). Enhancing personal and planetary wellbeing: A comparative study of the "3 Good Things" and "3 Good Things in Nature" interventions. International Journal of Wellbeing. 15(4). 1–28. 2 indexed citations
2.
Lengieza, Michael L., et al.. (2025). Feature networks: The environmental features that are central to nature- connectedness experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning. 259. 105362–105362.
4.
Sheffield, David, et al.. (2025). How are nature exposures and nature connectedness related to well‐being and environmentalism in the population of England?. People and Nature. 7(6). 1351–1365. 1 indexed citations
5.
Richardson, Miles, et al.. (2025). Introducing Heritage Connectedness: Connections to People, Nature and Place Across Time are Associated with Wellbeing and Environmentalism. The Historic Environment Policy & Practice. 16(1). 38–58.
6.
Richardson, Miles, Michael L. Lengieza, Mathew P. White, et al.. (2025). Macro-level determinants of nature connectedness: An exploratory analysis of 61 countries. AMBIO. 55(1). 80–100. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lengieza, Michael L., et al.. (2024). Situation networks: The emotions and activities that are central to nature-connectedness experiences. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 101. 102491–102491. 4 indexed citations
8.
Hamlin, Iain, et al.. (2023). The Joy of birds: the effect of rating for joy or counting garden bird species on wellbeing, anxiety, and nature connection. Urban Ecosystems. 26(3). 755–765. 30 indexed citations
9.
Richardson, Miles. (2023). GC Insights: Nature stripes for raising engagement with biodiversity loss. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(1). 11–14.
10.
Lengieza, Michael L., et al.. (2023). The Human–Nature Relationship as a Tangible Target for Pro-Environmental Behaviour—Guidance from Interpersonal Relationships. Sustainability. 15(16). 12175–12175. 18 indexed citations
11.
Price, Eluned C., et al.. (2022). Factors associated with nature connectedness in school-aged children. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 100037–100037. 26 indexed citations
13.
Richardson, Miles, et al.. (2022). Nature Connectedness, Nonattachment, and Engagement with Nature's Beauty Predict Pro-Nature Conservation Behavior. Ecopsychology. 14(2). 83–91. 18 indexed citations
14.
Richardson, Miles & Iain Hamlin. (2021). Nature engagement for human and nature’s well-being during the Corona pandemic. Journal of Public Mental Health. 20(2). 83–93. 36 indexed citations
15.
Gordon, William Van, et al.. (2021). A Novel Mindful Nature Connectedness Intervention Improves Paranoia but Not Anxiety in a Nonclinical Population. Ecopsychology. 13(4). 248–256. 4 indexed citations
16.
Richardson, Miles, et al.. (2019). Analyzing Objective and Subjective Data in Social Sciences: Implications for Smart Cities. IEEE Access. 7. 19890–19906. 9 indexed citations
17.
Richardson, Miles, Zaheer Hussain, & Mark D. Griffiths. (2018). Problematic smartphone use, nature connectedness, and anxiety. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 7(1). 109–116. 99 indexed citations
18.
Richardson, Miles & David Sheffield. (2015). Reflective Self-Attention: A More Stable Predictor of Connection to Nature Than Mindful Attention. Ecopsychology. 7(3). 166–175. 39 indexed citations
19.
Richardson, Miles. (1999). Place, Narrative, and the Writing Self: The Poetics of Being in The Garden of Eden. 35(2). 3 indexed citations
20.
Richardson, Miles & Malcolm C. Webb. (1986). The burden of being civilized : an anthropological perspective on the discontents of civilization. University of Georgia Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026