Mikhail Silk

25 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Mikhail Silk
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Biotechnology 146
  • Hepatology 80
  • Cancer Research 90
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 172
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 113
Replace Ami M. Karkar with:
Ami M. Karkar United States
Farrah J. Wolf United States
Shree Venkat United States
Alexandra Barabasch Germany
Petrousjka van den Tol Netherlands
Barbara M. Zonderhuis Netherlands
Petrousjka M. P. van den Tol Netherlands
Marco Dollinger Germany
Stojan Potrč Slovenia
K.J. Barbery United States
Mikhail Silk relative to Ami M. Karkar United States Ami M. Karkar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Ami M. Karkar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mikhail Silk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mikhail Silk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mikhail Silk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mikhail Silk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mikhail Silk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mikhail Silk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mikhail Silk. The network helps show where Mikhail Silk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mikhail Silk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mikhail Silk Line = papers co-authored together Mikhail Silk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013123
2 201496
3 201443
4 201441
5 201430
6 201529
7 202214
8 201414
9 201812
10 20228
11 20216
12 20154
13 20213
14 20253
15 20153
16 20152
17 20132
18 20152
19 20172
20 20241

About Mikhail Silk

Mikhail Silk is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Hepatology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Internal Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Inactivation Methods (8 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (6 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (5 papers), Radiology practices and education (4 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (146 citations), Hepatology (80 citations), Cancer Research (90 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (172 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (113 citations). Mikhail Silk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy C. Durack, Stephen B. Solomon, Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Thomas Wimmer, Karen T. Brown, T. Peter Kingham, Yuman Fong, Raymond H. Thornton and Jonathan Coleman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Cancers, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, European Journal of Radiology and Lung Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026