Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Morris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Morris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Morris more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Morris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Morris. The network helps show where Mike Morris may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Morris
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Morris.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Morris based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Morris. Mike Morris is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mvumi, Brighton M., et al.. (2012). Innovation Africa. Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich).11 indexed citations
4.
Morris, Mike, Raphael Kaplinsky, & David Kaplan. (2011). Commodities and Linkages: Industrialisation in Sub Saharan Africa. Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town).13 indexed citations
Kaplinsky, Raphael & Mike Morris. (2010). The Policy Challenge for Sub-Saharan Africa of Large-Scale Chinese FDI. Análisis del Real Instituto Elcano ( ARI ). 18(169). 1–23.4 indexed citations
7.
Morris, Mike, et al.. (2009). Clothing and textiles. Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town).14 indexed citations
8.
Morris, Mike & Justin Barnes. (2009). Globalization, the Changed Global Dynamics of the Clothing and Textile Value Chains and the Impact on Sub-Saharan Africa. Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town).24 indexed citations
9.
Kaplinsky, Raphael, Dorothy McCormick, & Mike Morris. (2007). The impact of China on sub-Saharan Africa. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).97 indexed citations
Morris, Mike, et al.. (2003). E-commerce for exporting garments from South Africa : "digital dividend" or leap of faith?. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).6 indexed citations
12.
Christiansen, J., et al.. (2000). Robust Ion-Implantation Process Design through Statistical Analysis. TechConnect Briefs. 40–43.1 indexed citations
Morris, Mike. (1991). The Future of Socialism. Transformation.1 indexed citations
16.
Morris, Mike & Vishnu Padayachee. (1989). Hegemonic projects, accumulation strategies and State reform policy in South Africa. 22(1). 65–109.6 indexed citations
17.
Morris, Mike & Vishnu Padayachee. (1988). STATE REFORM POLICY IN SOUTH AFRICA. Transformation. 1–26.27 indexed citations
18.
Morris, Mike. (1981). Capital's responses to African Trade Unions Post Wiehahn. 7. 69–85.1 indexed citations
19.
Morris, Mike, et al.. (1981). Manufacturing capital and the question of African Trade Union recognition 1960-64. 7. 86–107.1 indexed citations
20.
Strom, Peter F., Mike Morris, & M. S. Finstein. (1980). LEAF COMPOSTING THROUGH APPROPRIATE, LOW-LEVEL, TECHNOLOGY.. 21(6). 44–48.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.