Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?
Countries citing papers authored by Hubert Schmitz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hubert Schmitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hubert Schmitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hubert Schmitz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hubert Schmitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hubert Schmitz. The network helps show where Hubert Schmitz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hubert Schmitz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hubert Schmitz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hubert Schmitz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hubert Schmitz. Hubert Schmitz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roberts, Cameron, Frank W. Geels, Matthew Lockwood, et al.. (2018). The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science. 44. 304–311.235 indexed citations breakdown →
Schmitz, Hubert. (2014). How does the Global Power Shift Affect the Low Carbon Transformation. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).1 indexed citations
Moore, Mick & Hubert Schmitz. (2008). Idealism, realism and the investment climate in developing countries. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).57 indexed citations
Schmitz, Hubert. (2004). LOCAL UPGRADING IN GLOBAL CHAINS: RECENT FINDINGS.12 indexed citations
14.
Schmitz, Hubert & John Humphrey. (2000). Governance and Upgrading: Linking Industrial Cluster and Global Value Chain Research. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).366 indexed citations
15.
Schmitz, Hubert. (2000). ¿Tiene importancia la cooperación local? Experiencias de clusters industriales en el sur de Asia y América Latina. 60(9). 4–17.1 indexed citations
16.
Schmitz, Hubert. (1997). Eficiência coletiva: caminho de crescimento para a indústria de pequeno porte. Ensaios FEE. 18(2). 164–200.21 indexed citations
17.
Humphrey, John & Hubert Schmitz. (1996). Trust and Economic Development. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA).38 indexed citations
18.
Schmitz, Hubert. (1990). Flexible specialisation in third world industry : prospects and research requirements.8 indexed citations
19.
Schmitz, Hubert. (1989). Flexible specialisation : a new paradigm of small-scale industrialisation?. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).57 indexed citations
20.
Schmitz, Hubert. (1985). Microelectronics : implications for employment, outwork, skills and wages.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.