Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?
2010512 citationsMike Hodson, Simon MarvinResearch Policyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Hodson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Hodson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Hodson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Hodson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Hodson. The network helps show where Mike Hodson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Hodson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Hodson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Hodson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Hodson. Mike Hodson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hodson, Mike, et al.. (2012). Reshaping Urban Infrastructure. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 16(6). 789–800.75 indexed citations
8.
Bulkeley, Harriet, et al.. (2011). Cities and the low carbon transition. UCL Discovery (University College London).27 indexed citations
9.
Swilling, Mark, Bella Robinson, Simon Marvin, & Mike Hodson. (2011). Growing greener cities. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford).2 indexed citations
10.
Hodson, Mike & Simon Marvin. (2010). Making low-carbon England and Wales. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford).2 indexed citations
11.
Breukers, Sylvia, et al.. (2010). Practicing learning and learning in practice: Testing learning tools for energy demand side management projects. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology).3 indexed citations
Hodson, Mike & Simon Marvin. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?. Research Policy. 39(4). 477–485.512 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Hodson, Mike & Simon Marvin. (2009). Urban ecological security : a new paradigm?. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford).1 indexed citations
Hodson, Mike, et al.. (2007). Local negotiation and alignment of expectations - and transfer of lessons in niche development trajectories:. TNO Repository.1 indexed citations
17.
Brohmann, Bettina, et al.. (2007). Factors influencing the societal acceptance of new, renewable and energy efficiency technologies : Meta-analysis of recent European projects. Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town).22 indexed citations
18.
Hodson, Mike & Simon Marvin. (2005). Emerging UK hydrogen economies: policy/urban and regional infrastructure ‘drivers’. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford).
Murray, Patricia, et al.. (1986). LONG TERM DISABILITY FOLLOWING ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.