Mike Farjam

970 total citations · 1 hit paper
30 papers, 581 citations indexed

About

Mike Farjam is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Mike Farjam has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 581 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Safety Research and 5 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Mike Farjam's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (8 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers) and Social Media and Politics (5 papers). Mike Farjam is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (8 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers) and Social Media and Politics (5 papers). Mike Farjam collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Netherlands. Mike Farjam's co-authors include Giangiacomo Bravo, Flaminio Squazzoni, Francisco Grimaldo, Bahar Mehmani, Daniel García-Costa, Aliaksandr Birukou, Ana Marušić, Michael Willis, Pierpaolo Dondio and Francisco Grimaldo Moreno and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Science Advances and Ecological Economics.

In The Last Decade

Mike Farjam

26 papers receiving 559 citations

Hit Papers

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during ... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 40 80 120

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mike Farjam Sweden 10 165 115 103 103 70 30 581
Love Börjeson Sweden 6 101 0.6× 175 1.5× 62 0.6× 20 0.2× 16 0.2× 14 451
Anna Villarroya Spain 11 121 0.7× 88 0.8× 116 1.1× 8 0.1× 19 0.3× 37 552
Michał Krawczyk Poland 15 241 1.5× 88 0.8× 45 0.4× 21 0.2× 44 0.6× 61 976
Jacqueline Leta Brazil 16 98 0.6× 61 0.5× 408 4.0× 32 0.3× 3 0.0× 57 1.0k
Michael J. Liersch United States 8 122 0.7× 19 0.2× 5 0.0× 45 0.4× 47 0.7× 8 629
Mads P. Sørensen Denmark 15 149 0.9× 21 0.2× 99 1.0× 9 0.1× 11 0.2× 30 584
Thomas Franssen Netherlands 13 199 1.2× 21 0.2× 262 2.5× 11 0.1× 12 0.2× 27 722
Garret Christensen United States 11 79 0.5× 38 0.3× 108 1.0× 9 0.1× 8 0.1× 20 577
Elba Mauleón Spain 8 51 0.3× 111 1.0× 128 1.2× 9 0.1× 6 0.1× 15 375
Ricardo B. Duque United States 12 153 0.9× 13 0.1× 85 0.8× 9 0.1× 7 0.1× 21 457

Countries citing papers authored by Mike Farjam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Farjam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Farjam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Farjam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Farjam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Farjam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Farjam. The network helps show where Mike Farjam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Farjam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Farjam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Farjam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Farjam. Mike Farjam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Farjam, Mike, et al.. (2025). A Practical Guide and Case Study on How to Instruct LLMs for Automated Coding During Content Analysis. Social Science Computer Review. 1 indexed citations
3.
Farjam, Mike, et al.. (2025). From disruptive protests to disrupted news frames: Comparing German news on climate protests. Journalism. 1 indexed citations
4.
Farjam, Mike, et al.. (2024). The uses of the term polarisation in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021. Nordicom review/NORDICOM review. 45(1). 1–34.
5.
Farjam, Mike & Giangiacomo Bravo. (2024). Do you really believe that? The effect of economic incentives on the acceptance of real-world data in a polarized context. Royal Society Open Science. 11(4). 240252–240252. 1 indexed citations
6.
Farjam, Mike, et al.. (2023). Social conformity or attitude persistence? The bandwagon effect and the spiral of silence in a polarized context. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 34(3). 531–551. 11 indexed citations
7.
Bravo, Giangiacomo & Mike Farjam. (2022). Actions speak louder than words: Attitudes, behaviour, and partisan identity in a polarised environmental domain. Energy Research & Social Science. 90. 102547–102547. 13 indexed citations
8.
Forsman, Anders, Tine De Moor, René van Weeren, et al.. (2021). Comparisons of historical Dutch commons inform about the long-term dynamics of social-ecological systems. PLoS ONE. 16(8). e0256803–e0256803. 2 indexed citations
9.
Squazzoni, Flaminio, Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.. (2021). Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. PLoS ONE. 16(10). e0257919–e0257919. 126 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Farjam, Mike, Federico Bianchi, Flaminio Squazzoni, & Giangiacomo Bravo. (2021). Dangerous liaisons: an online experiment on the role of scientific experts and politicians in ensuring public support for anti-COVID measures. Royal Society Open Science. 8(3). 201310–201310. 9 indexed citations
11.
Moor, Tine De, Mike Farjam, René van Weeren, et al.. (2021). Taking sanctioning seriously: The impact of sanctions on the resilience of historical commons in Europe. Journal of Rural Studies. 87. 181–188. 5 indexed citations
12.
Squazzoni, Flaminio, Giangiacomo Bravo, Mike Farjam, et al.. (2021). Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals. Science Advances. 7(2). 113 indexed citations
13.
Farjam, Mike, Tine De Moor, René van Weeren, et al.. (2020). Shared Patterns in Long-Term Dynamics of Commons as Institutions for Collective Action. International Journal of the Commons. 14(1). 78–90. 14 indexed citations
14.
Farjam, Mike. (2020). The Bandwagon Effect in an Online Voting Experiment With Real Political Organizations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 33(2). 412–421. 22 indexed citations
15.
Forsman, Anders, Tine De Moor, René van Weeren, et al.. (2020). Eco-evolutionary perspectives on emergence, dispersion and dissolution of historical Dutch commons. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0236471–e0236471. 7 indexed citations
16.
Squazzoni, Flaminio, Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.. (2020). No Tickets for Women in the COVID-19 Race? A Study on Manuscript Submissions and Reviews in 2347 Elsevier Journals during the Pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal. 56 indexed citations
17.
Farjam, Mike, et al.. (2019). Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude-behavior gap in high-cost situations. SocArXiv (OSF Preprints). 2 indexed citations
18.
Farjam, Mike, et al.. (2019). Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude-behavior gap in high-cost situations. Ecological Economics. 166. 106434–106434. 118 indexed citations
19.
Farjam, Mike. (2019). On whom would I want to depend; humans or computers?. Journal of Economic Psychology. 72. 219–228. 8 indexed citations
20.
Farjam, Mike. (2015). On whom would I want to depend; Humans or nature?. Econstor (Econstor). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026