Miguel Holle
About
In The Last Decade
Miguel Holle
7 papers receiving 391 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Plant Science 303
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 239
- Molecular Biology 148
- Genetics 115
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 59
Countries citing papers authored by Miguel Holle
This map shows the geographic impact of Miguel Holle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miguel Holle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miguel Holle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miguel Holle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miguel Holle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miguel Holle. The network helps show where Miguel Holle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miguel Holle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miguel Holle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miguel Holle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miguel Holle. Miguel Holle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Raíces y tubérculos andinos : avances de investigación | 1 |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 90 | |
| 6 | 196 | |
| 7 | 77 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.