Miguel Cendales
- Geophysics top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 5%
- Ecology
- Topics
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences (5 papers)Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers)Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers)
- Journals
- Earth and Planetary Science LettersMeteoritics and Planetary ScienceLunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Miguel Cendales
8 papers receiving 882 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Geophysics 794
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 354
- Artificial Intelligence 133
- Geochemistry and Petrology 98
- Ecology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Miguel Cendales
This map shows the geographic impact of Miguel Cendales's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miguel Cendales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miguel Cendales more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miguel Cendales
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miguel Cendales. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miguel Cendales. The network helps show where Miguel Cendales may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miguel Cendales
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miguel Cendales. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miguel Cendales based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miguel Cendales. Miguel Cendales is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | The Abundances of Major, Minor and Trace Elements in the Earth's Mantle as Derived from Primitive Ultramafic Nodulesbreakdown → | 709 |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | New data on lunar samples and achondrites and a comparison of the least fractionated samples from the earth, the moon and the eucrite parent body. | 75 |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | On the chemistry of lunar samples and achondrites. Primary matter in the lunar highlands: a re-evaluation. | 79 |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | Trace element distribution between metal and silicates of ordinary chondrites | 8 |
About Miguel Cendales
Miguel Cendales is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Geophysics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomical and nuclear sciences (5 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (794 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (354 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (98 citations). Miguel Cendales has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include G. Dreibus, H. Wänke, H. Baddenhausen, K. Blum, H. Palme, E. Jagoutz, B. Spettel, V. Lorenz, E. R. Rambaldi and H. Hofmeister. Their work appears in journals such as Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Meteoritics and Planetary Science and Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.