Miguel Atienza
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Building and Construction top 2%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Martín Arias‐LoyolaPatrício ArocaNicholas A. PhelpsMarcelo LufínJosé Ernesto AmorósMoritz BreulFélix ModregoDavid A. Fleming
- Topics
- Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (20 papers)Mining and Resource Management (17 papers)Regional resilience and development (13 papers)
In The Last Decade
Miguel Atienza
53 papers receiving 906 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Economics and Econometrics 381
- Building and Construction 374
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 252
- Strategy and Management 179
- Sociology and Political Science 138
Countries citing papers authored by Miguel Atienza
This map shows the geographic impact of Miguel Atienza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miguel Atienza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miguel Atienza more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miguel Atienza
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miguel Atienza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miguel Atienza. The network helps show where Miguel Atienza may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miguel Atienza
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miguel Atienza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miguel Atienza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miguel Atienza. Miguel Atienza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | Spatial concentration in Latin America and the role of institutions | 24 |
| 20 | 67 |
About Miguel Atienza
Miguel Atienza is a scholar working on Development, Business and International Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (20 papers), Mining and Resource Management (17 papers) and Regional resilience and development (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (252 citations), Development (107 citations) and Business and International Management (58 citations). Miguel Atienza has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Australia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Martín Arias‐Loyola, Patrício Aroca, Nicholas A. Phelps, Marcelo Lufín, José Ernesto Amorós, Moritz Breul, Félix Modrego, David A. Fleming, Robert J. Stimson and Roger R. Stough. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Regional Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.