Michiel van Vreeswijk
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Arnoud ArntzJill LobbestaelPhilip SpinhovenE.G. SchoutenMarjon NadortSusan SimpsonCaroline ReidPatrick Luyten
- Topics
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (11 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers)Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (4 papers)
- Journals
- Behaviour Research and TherapyPersonality and Individual DifferencesFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michiel van Vreeswijk
11 papers receiving 406 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Clinical Psychology 410
- Philosophy 70
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 68
- Social Psychology 43
- Cognitive Neuroscience 34
Countries citing papers authored by Michiel van Vreeswijk
This map shows the geographic impact of Michiel van Vreeswijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michiel van Vreeswijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michiel van Vreeswijk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michiel van Vreeswijk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michiel van Vreeswijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michiel van Vreeswijk. The network helps show where Michiel van Vreeswijk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michiel van Vreeswijk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michiel van Vreeswijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michiel van Vreeswijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michiel van Vreeswijk. Michiel van Vreeswijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Mindfulness and Schema Therapy: A Practical Guide | 18 |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Schema Therapy: Theory, Research, and Practice | 62 |
| 7 | 158 | |
| 8 | 67 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 65 |
About Michiel van Vreeswijk
Michiel van Vreeswijk is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (11 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (410 citations), Philosophy (70 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (68 citations). Michiel van Vreeswijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arnoud Arntz, Jill Lobbestael, Philip Spinhoven, E.G. Schouten, Marjon Nadort, Susan Simpson, Caroline Reid, Patrick Luyten, Elisabeth H.M. Eurelings-Bontekoe and Michel Wensing. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Personality and Individual Differences and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.