Mi-Chia Ma

1.0k citations
48 papers · 746 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mi-Chia Ma

46 papers receiving 729 citations

Peers

Mi-Chia Ma
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Sensory Systems 68
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 134
  • Pharmaceutical Science 48
  • Statistics and Probability 41
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 66
Replace Andrew R. Moore with:
Andrew R. Moore United Kingdom
Frank G. Williams United States
Maria Isaac United States
Adam Jacobs United States
Dóra Koller Spain
Cristiana Gassmann-Mayer United States
Amy Brower United States
David Millson United Kingdom
Daniel Bridges United Kingdom
R. K. S. Lim United States
Mi-Chia Ma relative to Andrew R. Moore United Kingdom Andrew R. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Andrew R. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mi-Chia Ma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mi-Chia Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mi-Chia Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mi-Chia Ma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mi-Chia Ma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mi-Chia Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mi-Chia Ma. The network helps show where Mi-Chia Ma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mi-Chia Ma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mi-Chia Ma Line = papers co-authored together Mi-Chia Ma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201083
2 201168
3 202351
4 200544
5 201343
6 201441
7 201140
8 200135
9 199732
10 200025
11
STATISTICAL EVALUATIONS OF DISSOLUTION SIMILARITY
199923
12 200519
13 201318
14 201817
15 201215
16 201814
17 202114
18 201112
19 200712
20 201811

About Mi-Chia Ma

Mi-Chia Ma is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Spectroscopy and Statistics and Probability, having authored 48 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (68 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (134 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (48 citations), Statistics and Probability (41 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (66 citations). Mi-Chia Ma has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Jen‐pei Liu, Jian‐Kang Chao, Tsung-Tsair Yang, Jiunn-Liang Wu, Yih-Min Sun, Cheng-Yu Lin, Tung-Sheng Shih, Perng‐Jy Tsai, Yue Leon Guo and Yea-Shwu Hwang. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Nutrients, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research and Journal of Refractive Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact