Michelle Stratemeyer

789 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 506 citations indexed

About

Michelle Stratemeyer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Stratemeyer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 506 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Gender Studies and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michelle Stratemeyer's work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Digital Games and Media (2 papers). Michelle Stratemeyer is often cited by papers focused on Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Digital Games and Media (2 papers). Michelle Stratemeyer collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Michelle Stratemeyer's co-authors include Nick Haslam, Benjamin Paaßen, Thekla Morgenroth, Peter Koval, Elise Holland, Fiona J. Thomson, Renee J. Thompson, Tomi‐Ann Roberts, Michael J. Zyphur and Natasha H. Bailen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Sex Roles and British Journal of Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Stratemeyer

7 papers receiving 494 citations

Hit Papers

What is a True Gamer? The... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michelle Stratemeyer Australia 6 302 162 139 119 49 8 506
Jana Hackathorn United States 14 188 0.6× 91 0.6× 143 1.0× 182 1.5× 52 1.1× 31 521
Amanda K. Sesko United States 6 270 0.9× 163 1.0× 87 0.6× 213 1.8× 19 0.4× 14 463
Agata Gluszek United States 4 232 0.8× 60 0.4× 49 0.4× 96 0.8× 54 1.1× 4 625
Cindy Faith Miller United States 10 139 0.5× 215 1.3× 79 0.6× 99 0.8× 39 0.8× 19 448
L. Alvin Malesky United States 9 354 1.2× 52 0.3× 209 1.5× 81 0.7× 24 0.5× 16 502
Yalda T. Uhls United States 10 399 1.3× 56 0.3× 116 0.8× 111 0.9× 25 0.5× 16 658
Olga V. Mitina Russia 11 126 0.4× 34 0.2× 105 0.8× 88 0.7× 96 2.0× 71 425
Rebecca S. Frazier United States 4 230 0.8× 37 0.2× 72 0.5× 180 1.5× 31 0.6× 6 490
Leora Trub United States 12 429 1.4× 58 0.4× 185 1.3× 151 1.3× 11 0.2× 31 658
Santiago Resett Argentina 8 132 0.4× 116 0.7× 91 0.7× 131 1.1× 50 1.0× 51 350

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Stratemeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Stratemeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Stratemeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Stratemeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Stratemeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Stratemeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Stratemeyer. The network helps show where Michelle Stratemeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Stratemeyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Stratemeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Stratemeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Stratemeyer. Michelle Stratemeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Morgenroth, Thekla, Michelle Stratemeyer, & Benjamin Paaßen. (2020). The Gendered Nature and Malleability of Gamer Stereotypes. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 23(8). 557–561. 5 indexed citations
2.
3.
Koval, Peter, Elise Holland, Michael J. Zyphur, et al.. (2019). How does it feel to be treated like an object? Direct and indirect effects of exposure to sexual objectification on women’s emotions in daily life.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 116(6). 885–898. 42 indexed citations
4.
Stratemeyer, Michelle, et al.. (2018). Recruit Smarter - Technical Report. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne). 1 indexed citations
5.
Paaßen, Benjamin, Thekla Morgenroth, & Michelle Stratemeyer. (2016). What is a True Gamer? The Male Gamer Stereotype and the Marginalization of Women in Video Game Culture. Sex Roles. 76(7-8). 421–435. 212 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Haslam, Nick & Michelle Stratemeyer. (2016). Recent research on dehumanization. Current Opinion in Psychology. 11. 25–29. 144 indexed citations
7.
Haslam, Nick, et al.. (2016). Scholarly productivity and citation impact of academic psychologists in Group of Eight universities. Australian Journal of Psychology. 69(3). 162–166. 11 indexed citations
8.
Holland, Elise, Peter Koval, Michelle Stratemeyer, Fiona J. Thomson, & Nick Haslam. (2016). Sexual objectification in women's daily lives: A smartphone ecological momentary assessment study. British Journal of Social Psychology. 56(2). 314–333. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026