Michelle Poe
About
In The Last Decade
Michelle Poe
3 papers receiving 62 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- General Health Professions 40
- Economics and Econometrics 27
- Speech and Hearing 22
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 17
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 11
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Poe
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Poe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Poe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Poe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Poe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Poe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Poe. The network helps show where Michelle Poe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Poe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Poe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Poe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Poe. Michelle Poe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 29 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.