Michelle Kendell

528 total citations
10 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

Michelle Kendell is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Social Psychology and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Kendell has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Pharmacology, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Michelle Kendell's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers). Michelle Kendell is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers). Michelle Kendell collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and Canada. Michelle Kendell's co-authors include Peter O’Sullivan, Karen Richards, Darren Beales, Martin Rabey, Anne Smith, Jonathan Hill, Leon Straker, Stephen J. Edmondston, Helen Slater and Peter Kent and has published in prestigious journals such as Pain, Spine and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Kendell

10 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michelle Kendell Australia 7 322 109 107 95 90 10 410
Natacha Fouquet France 12 310 1.0× 97 0.9× 122 1.1× 48 0.5× 68 0.8× 35 493
Karen Richards Australia 5 300 0.9× 135 1.2× 124 1.2× 97 1.0× 71 0.8× 9 398
Sharon M. H. Tsang Hong Kong 12 336 1.0× 180 1.7× 123 1.1× 106 1.1× 113 1.3× 34 516
Jean-Daniel Dubois Canada 11 344 1.1× 70 0.6× 45 0.4× 90 0.9× 84 0.9× 13 401
Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn Thailand 12 267 0.8× 46 0.4× 128 1.2× 122 1.3× 101 1.1× 27 459
Diana De Carvalho Canada 12 420 1.3× 287 2.6× 132 1.2× 144 1.5× 138 1.5× 51 597
Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei Iran 12 274 0.9× 44 0.4× 129 1.2× 93 1.0× 116 1.3× 39 491
Leila Ghamkhar Iran 14 404 1.3× 58 0.5× 103 1.0× 98 1.0× 151 1.7× 32 530
Kerstin Waling Sweden 7 317 1.0× 66 0.6× 97 0.9× 67 0.7× 67 0.7× 8 423
Min-Sik Yong South Korea 10 185 0.6× 86 0.8× 123 1.1× 64 0.7× 42 0.5× 23 361

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Kendell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Kendell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Kendell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Kendell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Kendell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Kendell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Kendell. The network helps show where Michelle Kendell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Kendell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Kendell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Kendell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Kendell. Michelle Kendell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Kendell, Michelle, Anne Smith, Peter O’Sullivan, et al.. (2022). How do people with chronic low back pain pick a pencil off the floor?. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 40(3). 576–593. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rabey, Martin, et al.. (2021). Do chronic low back pain subgroups derived from dynamic quantitative sensory testing exhibit differing multidimensional profiles?. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 21(3). 474–484. 10 indexed citations
3.
Waller, Robert, Phillip E. Melton, Michelle Kendell, et al.. (2021). Heritability of musculoskeletal pain and pain sensitivity phenotypes: 2 generations of the Raine Study. Pain. 163(4). e580–e587. 3 indexed citations
4.
Rabey, Martin, et al.. (2021). Significant other interactions in people with chronic low back pain: Subgrouping and multidimensional profiles. British Journal of Pain. 16(3). 326–340. 7 indexed citations
5.
Beales, Darren, Peter Kent, Michelle Kendell, et al.. (2021). Only one fifth of young Australian adults have beliefs about medical imaging for low back pain that align with current evidence: A cross-sectional study. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 56. 102460–102460. 6 indexed citations
6.
Kendell, Michelle, Darren Beales, Peter O’Sullivan, et al.. (2018). The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool was limited in people with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study. Journal of physiotherapy. 64(2). 107–113. 27 indexed citations
7.
9.
Edmondston, Stephen J., et al.. (2013). Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement responses to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 18(3). 231–236. 7 indexed citations
10.
O’Sullivan, Peter, et al.. (2002). The Effect of Different Standing and Sitting Postures on Trunk Muscle Activity in a Pain-Free Population. Spine. 27(11). 1238–1244. 306 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026