Michelle Jarick

643 citations
20 papers · 423 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michelle Jarick

20 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Michelle Jarick
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • General Decision Sciences 50
  • Sensory Systems 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 171
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 194
  • Clinical Psychology 148
Replace Emma Blakey with:
Emma Blakey United Kingdom
Mark C. Price Norway
Isabella Fuchs Austria
Susana Ruiz Fernández Germany
Chris Blais United States
Bryan D. Poole United States
Sean C. Draine United States
Ruben Laukkonen Australia
Juan J. Ortells Spain
Maja Dshemuchadse Germany
Michelle Jarick relative to Emma Blakey United Kingdom Emma Blakey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Emma Blakey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Jarick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Jarick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Jarick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Jarick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Jarick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Jarick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Jarick. The network helps show where Michelle Jarick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Jarick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle Jarick Line = papers co-authored together Michelle Jarick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201268
2 201152
3 200645
4 201942
5 201236
6 201534
7 200933
8 200931
9 201911
10 201611
11 201711
12 20119
13 20119
14 20099
15 20216
16 20135
17 20104
18 20083
19 20133
20 20101

About Michelle Jarick

Michelle Jarick is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 20 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (50 citations), Sensory Systems (65 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (171 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (194 citations) and Clinical Psychology (148 citations). Michelle Jarick has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mike J. Dixon, Kevin Harrigan, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Jeffery A. Jones, Alan Kingstone, Vance V. MacLaren, Daniel Smilek, Emily C. Maxwell, Michael E. R. Nicholls and Michael J. Dixon. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Experimental Brain Research, International Gambling Studies, Cortex and Journal of Vision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact