Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Habit Persistence, Asset Returns, and the Business Cycle
2001688 citationsMichele Boldrín, Lawrence J. Christiano et al.American Economic Reviewprofile →
Inequality and convergence in Europe's regions: reconsidering European regional policies
Countries citing papers authored by Michele Boldrín
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michele Boldrín's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michele Boldrín with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michele Boldrín more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michele Boldrín. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michele Boldrín. The network helps show where Michele Boldrín may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michele Boldrín
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michele Boldrín.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michele Boldrín based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michele Boldrín. Michele Boldrín is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boldrín, Michele & David K. Levine. (2013). Patents and the Dissemination of Inventions.1 indexed citations
5.
Boldrín, Michele, Juan A. Correa, David K. Levine, & Carmine Ornaghi. (2011). Competition and Innovation. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).5 indexed citations
6.
Boldrín, Michele, et al.. (2010). Eppur si Muove! Spain: Growing without a Model. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1–41.7 indexed citations
Boldrín, Michele & Sergi Jiménez‐Martín. (2007). Evaluating Spanish Pension Expenditure under Alternative Reform Scenarios. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 351–412.
Boldrín, Michele & Fabio Canova. (2003). Regional Policies and EU Enlargement. SSRN Electronic Journal.25 indexed citations
15.
Peracchi, Franco, Michele Boldrín, & Sergi Jiménez‐Martín. (2002). Micro-Modelling of retirement behavior in Spain. 7–86.6 indexed citations
16.
Boldrín, Michele, Lawrence J. Christiano, & Jonas D. M. Fisher. (2001). Habit Persistence, Asset Returns, and the Business Cycle. American Economic Review. 91(1). 149–166.688 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Boldrín, Michele & Fabio Canova. (2001). Inequality and convergence in Europe's regions: reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy. 16(32). 206–253.496 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Boldrín, Michele, Sergi Jiménez‐Martín, & Franco Peracchi. (1997). Social Security and Retirement in Spain. National Bureau of Economic Research. 305–353.42 indexed citations
19.
Montes, A., et al.. (1997). Educación pública, crecimiento y desigualdad social. Moneda y crédito. 161–212.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.