Michel Chodkiewicz

29 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers

Michel Chodkiewicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Religious studies 47
  • Political Science and International Relations 166
  • Philosophy 47
  • Archeology 41
  • Anthropology 36
Replace Hava Lazarus-Yafeh with:
Hava Lazarus-Yafeh Israel
Wilferd Madelung United Kingdom
Gregor Schoeler Switzerland
Werner Ende
Khaled El-Rouayheb United States
Mohammed Arkoun France
Jacques Waardenburg Switzerland
Ian Richard Netton United Kingdom
Josef van Ess Germany
Ahmet T. Karamustafa United States
Michel Chodkiewicz relative to Hava Lazarus-Yafeh Israel Hava Lazarus-Yafeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Hava Lazarus-Yafeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michel Chodkiewicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Chodkiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Chodkiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Chodkiewicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Chodkiewicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Chodkiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Chodkiewicz. The network helps show where Michel Chodkiewicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Michel Chodkiewicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michel Chodkiewicz Line = papers co-authored together Michel Chodkiewicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198669
2 200050
3
Seal of the saints : prophethood and sainthood in the doctrine of Ibn ʿArabī
199317
4
An Ocean Without Shore: Ibn Arabi, the Book, and the Law
199315
5 199114
6 198812
7 198310
8 19986
9 19886
10 19936
11 20015
12 19955
13
The Meccan revelations
20025
14 19924
15 19864
16 19874
17 19864
18 19853
19 19883
20
The spiritual writings of Amir ʿAbd al-Kader
19952

About Michel Chodkiewicz

Michel Chodkiewicz is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Archeology and Philosophy, having authored 43 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (30 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (16 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (13 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (11 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (7 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (6 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (4 papers) and Families in Therapy and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (47 citations), Political Science and International Relations (166 citations), Philosophy (47 citations), Archeology (41 citations) and Anthropology (36 citations). Michel Chodkiewicz has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Annemarie Schımmel, Alexander Knysh, R. S. O’Fahey, James Winston Morris, Paul Fenton, Aziz Al–Azmeh, Claude Gilliot, Richard G. Hovannisian, Georges Sabagh and Bruce B. Lawrence. Their work appears in journals such as Studia Islamica, Nature, Al-Masāq, Revue de l histoire des religions and Journal of the American Oriental Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact