Michał Skalski

641 citations
44 papers · 414 indexed · h-index 12

Michał Skalski

42 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Michał Skalski
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Urology 86
  • Biological Psychiatry 33
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 24
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 44
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
Replace Minou Mayer with:
Minou Mayer United States
Sierra Simpson United States
Lauren Powell United States
Simon Spedding Australia
Eun Young Kim South Korea
Jörg Wipplinger Austria
Kuljeet Singh Anand India
Xavier Preudʼhomme United States
P. Eric Konicki United States
Arlene Licudine United States
Michał Skalski relative to Minou Mayer United States Minou Mayer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Minou Mayer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michał Skalski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michał Skalski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michał Skalski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michał Skalski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michał Skalski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michał Skalski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michał Skalski. The network helps show where Michał Skalski may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michał Skalski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michał Skalski Line = papers co-authored together Michał Skalski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20221
3 20220
4 20211
5 20211
6 20193
7 20191
8 20187
9 201722
10 20178
11 201714
12 20166
13 201611
14 20166
15 201542
16 201368
17 199618
18 199633
19
Principles, main goals and methods of the nationwide program: "investigations on iodine deficiency and model of iodine prophylaxis in Poland".
19935
20
Goiter incidence and urinary iodine excretion in children of age group 6-13 years living in south-eastern Poland (Kraków coordinating center).
19931

About Michał Skalski

Michał Skalski is a scholar working on Urology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 44 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (9 papers), Sleep and related disorders (9 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (8 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (86 citations), Biological Psychiatry (33 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (24 citations). Michał Skalski has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Maria Radziwoń-Zaleska, Dominika Dudek, Waldemar Szelenberger, Gabriel Nowak, Ewa Poleszak, Piotr Chłosta, Mikołaj Przydacz, Piotr Właź, Tomasz Gołąbek and Aleksandra Szopa. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Nutrients and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026