Michaela Bayer

445 citations
9 papers · 395 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 5
    • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 5

Michaela Bayer

9 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Michaela Bayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Endocrinology 87
  • Molecular Medicine 38
  • Genetics 181
  • Infectious Diseases 93
  • Ecology 126
Replace Anne McIntosh with:
Anne McIntosh United Kingdom
Kathryn Jane Turnbull Estonia
Jovanka T. Koo United States
Anna-Lena Forslund Sweden
Joyce J. W. Wong United States
Bert Roosendaal Netherlands
Mima Predich United States
Laure Plançon France
Neal Whitaker United States
Da‐Kang Shen United Kingdom
Michaela Bayer relative to Anne McIntosh United Kingdom Anne McIntosh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Anne McIntosh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaela Bayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaela Bayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaela Bayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaela Bayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaela Bayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaela Bayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaela Bayer. The network helps show where Michaela Bayer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michaela Bayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaela Bayer Line = papers co-authored together Michaela Bayer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2005103
2 199576
3 200755
4 199349
5 200143
6 197335
7 196217
8 200013
9
Evaluation of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of neopterin.
20054

About Michaela Bayer

Michaela Bayer is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics, Endocrinology, Virology and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (5 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (2 papers), Rabies epidemiology and control (1 paper), Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (1 paper) and Protein purification and stability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (87 citations), Molecular Medicine (38 citations), Genetics (181 citations), Infectious Diseases (93 citations) and Ecology (126 citations). Michaela Bayer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Günther Koraimann, Philip J. Youngman, Kerry M. Smith, Akira Kaji, Robert Eferl, G. Zellnig, Andreas Beranek, Maria Anna Wagner, Christoph Ruckenstuhl and Gernot Zarfel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, FEBS Letters, Transfusion, Microbiology and DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact