Michael Wünsche

714 total citations
44 papers, 596 citations indexed

About

Michael Wünsche is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Civil and Structural Engineering and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Wünsche has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 596 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Mechanics of Materials, 18 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering and 10 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Michael Wünsche's work include Numerical methods in engineering (37 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (14 papers) and Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (11 papers). Michael Wünsche is often cited by papers focused on Numerical methods in engineering (37 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (14 papers) and Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (11 papers). Michael Wünsche collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and Spain. Michael Wünsche's co-authors include J. Sládek, V. Sládek, Ch. Zhang, Andrés Sáez, Felipe García-Sánchez, Chuanzeng Zhang, Ernian Pan, Sohichi Hirose, Meinhard Kuna and P. Hübner and has published in prestigious journals such as Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering and Composite Structures.

In The Last Decade

Michael Wünsche

42 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Wünsche Germany 15 504 163 159 88 76 44 596
Y. Mikata United States 15 698 1.4× 98 0.6× 191 1.2× 151 1.7× 134 1.8× 32 853
Changsong Zhu China 14 445 0.9× 308 1.9× 140 0.9× 77 0.9× 65 0.9× 25 576
Kang Yong Lee South Korea 18 772 1.5× 81 0.5× 187 1.2× 120 1.4× 103 1.4× 41 838
R. Celorrio Spain 17 504 1.0× 73 0.4× 173 1.1× 75 0.9× 112 1.5× 46 570
Guoquan Nie China 14 591 1.2× 339 2.1× 72 0.5× 56 0.6× 206 2.7× 48 712
Atul Vir Singh India 13 227 0.5× 116 0.7× 122 0.8× 53 0.6× 85 1.1× 29 374
Cherif Othmani Tunisia 14 436 0.9× 133 0.8× 57 0.4× 61 0.7× 262 3.4× 38 510
Nima Nejadsadeghi United States 11 182 0.4× 159 1.0× 85 0.5× 46 0.5× 69 0.9× 14 317
Mei‐Feng Liu Taiwan 11 226 0.4× 109 0.7× 142 0.9× 84 1.0× 45 0.6× 25 395
P. Šolek Slovakia 12 402 0.8× 49 0.3× 132 0.8× 52 0.6× 34 0.4× 18 419

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Wünsche

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wünsche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wünsche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wünsche more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Wünsche

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wünsche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wünsche. The network helps show where Michael Wünsche may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Wünsche

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Wünsche. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Wünsche based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Wünsche. Michael Wünsche is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Wünsche, Michael, et al.. (2017). Time‐harmonic analysis of cracks in functionally graded piezoelectric materials. PAMM. 17(1). 283–284.
3.
Sládek, J., et al.. (2017). Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Size-Dependent Piezoelectric Solids under a Thermal Load. Key engineering materials. 754. 165–168. 1 indexed citations
4.
Sládek, J., et al.. (2017). Crack analysis of size-dependent piezoelectric solids under a thermal load. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 182. 187–201. 20 indexed citations
5.
Wünsche, Michael, J. Sládek, V. Sládek, Felipe García-Sánchez, & Andrés Sáez. (2016). Dynamic Crack Analysis in Functionally Graded Piezoelectric Materials by a Time-Domain BEM. Key engineering materials. 713. 342–345. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Sládek, J., V. Sládek, Ernian Pan, & Michael Wünsche. (2014). Fracture analysis in piezoelectric semiconductors under a thermal load. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 126. 27–39. 90 indexed citations
8.
Sládek, J., et al.. (2013). Crack analysis in decagonal quasicrystals by the MLPG. International Journal of Fracture. 181(1). 115–126. 25 indexed citations
9.
Sládek, J., et al.. (2012). MLPG Analysis of Layered Composites with Piezoelectric and Piezomagnetic Phases. Cmc-computers Materials & Continua. 29(1). 75–102. 14 indexed citations
10.
Wünsche, Michael, et al.. (2012). The influences of non-linear electrical, magnetic and mechanical boundary conditions on the dynamic intensity factors of magnetoelectroelastic solids. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 97. 297–313. 13 indexed citations
11.
Sládek, J., V. Sládek, Chuanzeng Zhang, & Michael Wünsche. (2012). Semi-permeable crack analysis in magnetoelectroelastic solids. Smart Materials and Structures. 21(2). 25003–25003. 22 indexed citations
12.
Sládek, J., et al.. (2012). Analysis of the bending of circular piezoelectric plates with functionally graded material properties by a MLPG method. Engineering Structures. 47. 81–89. 27 indexed citations
13.
Sládek, J., et al.. (2011). An Interaction Integral Method for Computing Fracture Parameters in Functionally Graded Magnetoelectroelastic Composites. Cmc-computers Materials & Continua. 23(1). 35–68. 12 indexed citations
14.
Hollander, Dirk A., et al.. (2011). Numerical Simulation of Multiple Fatigue Crack Growth with Additional Crack Initiation. Key engineering materials. 488-489. 444–447. 2 indexed citations
15.
Wünsche, Michael, Ch. Zhang, Felipe García-Sánchez, et al.. (2011). Dynamic crack analysis in piezoelectric solids with non-linear electrical and mechanical boundary conditions by a time-domain BEM. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 200(41-44). 2848–2858. 34 indexed citations
16.
Sládek, J., V. Sládek, Ch. Zhang, & Michael Wünsche. (2010). Crack Analysis in Piezoelectric Solids with Energetically Consistent Boundary Conditions by the MLPG. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences. 68(2). 185–220. 10 indexed citations
17.
Wünsche, Michael, Felipe García-Sánchez, Andrés Sáez, & Ch. Zhang. (2009). A 2D time-domain collocation-Galerkin BEM for dynamic crack analysis in piezoelectric solids. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements. 34(4). 377–387. 34 indexed citations
18.
Hollander, Dirk A., et al.. (2009). Simulation of Curved Fatigue Crack Growth with Calculation of the Plastic Limit Load. Key engineering materials. 417-418. 45–48. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hartmann, Dietrich, et al.. (2007). Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Curved Fatigue Crack Growth under Biaxial Proportional Cyclic Loading. Key engineering materials. 348-349. 857–860. 3 indexed citations
20.
Wünsche, Michael, et al.. (2003). Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Curved Fatigue Crack Growth under Proportional Cyclic Loading. steel research international. 74(9). 566–576. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026