Michael W. Keith

651 total citations
9 papers, 434 citations indexed

About

Michael W. Keith is a scholar working on Surgery, Computational Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael W. Keith has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 434 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Computational Mechanics and 4 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in Michael W. Keith's work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (4 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers). Michael W. Keith is often cited by papers focused on Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (4 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers). Michael W. Keith collaborates with scholars based in United States. Michael W. Keith's co-authors include Harry A. Hoyen, Dustin J. Tyler, Katharine H. Polasek, Kevin L. Kilgore, Robert F. Kirsch, Vincent R. Hentz, M.J. Mulcahey, G.B. Thrope, Peter H. Gorman and Sara Carroll and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering and Journal of Aircraft.

In The Last Decade

Michael W. Keith

9 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Michael W. Keith

BE

CMN

CN

PFM

SURGE

J.R. Buckett United States

Gilles Pinault United States

John Hobby United Kingdom

James P. Uhlir United States

Samuel C. Colachis United States

Ronald L. Hart United States

M. Ichie Japan

Fred W. Montague United States

Michael Keith United States

Allen W. Wiegner United States

J.R. Buckett United States

Michael W. Keith

408 ×1.4

BE

256 ×1.0

CMN

221 ×1.2

CN

122 ×1.1

PFM

97 ×1.1

SURGE

Citations per year, relative to Michael W. Keith Michael W. Keith (= 1×) peers J.R. Buckett

Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. Keith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. Keith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. Keith. The network helps show where Michael W. Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael W. Keith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael W. Keith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael W. Keith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael W. Keith. Michael W. Keith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Bryden, Anne M., Allan E. Peljovich, Harry A. Hoyen, et al.. (2012). Surgical Restoration of Arm and Hand Function in People with Tetraplegia. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 18(1). 43–49. 27 indexed citations

2.

Polasek, Katharine H., Harry A. Hoyen, Michael W. Keith, Robert F. Kirsch, & Dustin J. Tyler. (2009). Stimulation Stability and Selectivity of Chronically Implanted Multicontact Nerve Cuff Electrodes in the Human Upper Extremity. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 17(5). 428–437. 101 indexed citations

3.

Polasek, Katharine H., Harry A. Hoyen, Michael W. Keith, & Dustin J. Tyler. (2007). Human Nerve Stimulation Thresholds and Selectivity Using a Multi-contact Nerve Cuff Electrode. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 15(1). 76–82. 80 indexed citations

4.

Bryden, Anne M., et al.. (2005). An Implanted Neuroprosthesis for High Tetraplegia. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 10(3). 38–52. 14 indexed citations

5.

Peckham, P. Hunter, Michael W. Keith, Kevin L. Kilgore, et al.. (2001). Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: A multicenter study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 82(10). 1380–1388. 202 indexed citations

6.

Keith, Michael W., et al.. (1985). Aerodynamic canard/wing parametric analysis for general-aviation applications. Journal of Aircraft. 22(5). 401–408. 2 indexed citations

7.

Keith, Michael W., et al.. (1984). Aerodynamic canard/wing parametric analysis for general aviation applications. 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 1 indexed citations

8.

Keith, Michael W., et al.. (1984). Aerodynamic design optimization trim analysis of canard conventionalconfigurations. Journal of Aircraft. 21(3). 183–192. 4 indexed citations

9.

Keith, Michael W.. (1982). Parametric canard/wing aerodynamic trade-off analysis and trim design comparison of canard and conventional high performance general aviation configurations. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact