Michael W. Diehl
- Paleontology top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Archeology top 5%
- Archeology top 5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Co-authors
- Owen DavisSteven A. LeBlancRoger AnyonJohn ArthurPaul E. MinnisDavid A. GregoryMark R. Schurr
- Topics
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (14 papers)Archaeology and Natural History (8 papers)Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (7 papers)
- Cited by
- ArcheologyPaleontologyAnthropology
- Journals
- American AntiquityJournal of Field ArchaeologyArcheological Papers of the American Anthropological Association
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael W. Diehl
16 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Paleontology 195
- Anthropology 149
- Archeology 52
- Archeology 49
- Geography, Planning and Development 39
Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. Diehl
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. Diehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. Diehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. Diehl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. Diehl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. Diehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. Diehl. The network helps show where Michael W. Diehl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael W. Diehl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael W. Diehl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael W. Diehl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael W. Diehl. Michael W. Diehl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | The Safford Valley Grids: Prehistoric Cultivation in the Southern Arizona Desert edited by William E. Doolittle and James A. Neeley | 1 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | Early Pithouse Villages of the Mimbres Valley and Beyond: The McAnally and Thompson Sites in Their Cultural and Ecological Contexts | 13 |
| 9 | Hierarchies in action : Cui bono? | 76 |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 28 |
About Michael W. Diehl
Michael W. Diehl is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology and Anthropology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (14 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (8 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (49 citations), Paleontology (195 citations) and Anthropology (149 citations). Michael W. Diehl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Owen Davis, Steven A. LeBlanc, Roger Anyon, John Arthur, Paul E. Minnis, David A. Gregory and Mark R. Schurr. Their work appears in journals such as American Antiquity, Journal of Field Archaeology and Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.