Michael W. Carson

458 total citations
9 papers, 231 citations indexed

About

Michael W. Carson is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael W. Carson has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 231 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Michael W. Carson's work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (6 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (2 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers). Michael W. Carson is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (6 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (2 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers). Michael W. Carson collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Michael W. Carson's co-authors include Margot R. Roach, Kenneth A. Harris, Richard F. Potter, Guy DeRose, Doreen Kimura, Robert W. Brock, T.L. Forbes, Michael Schlag, Claudio M. Martin and Michael Troster and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, Personality and Individual Differences and American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology.

In The Last Decade

Michael W. Carson

9 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael W. Carson Canada 9 70 69 58 54 38 9 231
József Hőhn Hungary 9 72 1.0× 54 0.8× 68 1.2× 51 0.9× 47 1.2× 16 358
J Hanzlik Poland 7 43 0.6× 36 0.5× 40 0.7× 45 0.8× 22 0.6× 29 334
Maddalena Tessari Italy 12 104 1.5× 91 1.3× 57 1.0× 53 1.0× 90 2.4× 25 319
Claire L. Ivey United States 6 30 0.4× 17 0.2× 152 2.6× 41 0.8× 42 1.1× 6 238
Chen‐Fuh Lam Taiwan 10 78 1.1× 70 1.0× 42 0.7× 88 1.6× 14 0.4× 27 290
S. Kompa Germany 11 24 0.3× 72 1.0× 11 0.2× 29 0.5× 36 0.9× 20 355
J. Minten Belgium 10 102 1.5× 54 0.8× 61 1.1× 33 0.6× 53 1.4× 27 525
Wulf von Restorff Germany 8 47 0.7× 36 0.5× 31 0.5× 25 0.5× 44 1.2× 15 395
H. Sanchez France 11 40 0.6× 30 0.4× 38 0.7× 174 3.2× 22 0.6× 12 428
Emilie Jean‐St‐Michel Canada 6 43 0.6× 186 2.7× 25 0.4× 28 0.5× 16 0.4× 23 298

Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. Carson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. Carson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. Carson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. Carson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. Carson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. Carson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. Carson. The network helps show where Michael W. Carson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael W. Carson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael W. Carson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael W. Carson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael W. Carson. Michael W. Carson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Schlag, Michael, Sharon E. Clarke, Michael W. Carson, Kenneth A. Harris, & Richard F. Potter. (1999). The effect of mannitol versus dimethyl thiourea at attenuating ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury to skeletal muscle. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 29(3). 511–521. 9 indexed citations
2.
Brock, Robert W., Michael W. Carson, Kenneth A. Harris, & Richard F. Potter. (1999). Microcirculatory perfusion deficits are not essential for remote parenchymal injury within the liver. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 277(1). G55–G60. 23 indexed citations
3.
Harris, Kenneth A., Guy DeRose, Jeremy A. Scott, et al.. (1998). Ischemic tolerance in skeletal muscle: role of nitric oxide. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 275(1). H94–H99. 31 indexed citations
4.
Forbes, T.L., et al.. (1996). Leukocyte Activity and Tissue Injury Following Ischemia-Reperfusion in Skeletal Muscle. Microvascular Research. 51(3). 275–287. 22 indexed citations
5.
Harris, Kenneth A., Michael W. Carson, Claudio M. Martin, et al.. (1996). Intestinal mucosal permeability to 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid is increased after bilateral lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion in the rat. Surgery. 120(3). 547–553. 29 indexed citations
6.
Potter, Richard F., Michael W. Carson, T.L. Forbes, et al.. (1995). Measurement of Tissue Viability Using Intravital Microscopy and Fluorescent Nuclear Dyes. Journal of Surgical Research. 59(5). 521–526. 12 indexed citations
7.
Carson, Michael W., et al.. (1995). Skeletal muscle injury induced by ischemia-reperfusion.. PubMed. 38(1). 56–63. 19 indexed citations
8.
Kimura, Doreen & Michael W. Carson. (1995). Dermatoglyphic asymmetry: Relation to sex, handedness and cognitive pattern. Personality and Individual Differences. 19(4). 471–478. 28 indexed citations
9.
Carson, Michael W. & Margot R. Roach. (1990). The strength of the aortic media and its role in the propagation of aortic dissection. Journal of Biomechanics. 23(6). 579–588. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026