Michael Traugott

7.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
132 papers, 4.7k citations indexed

About

Michael Traugott is a scholar working on Ecology, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Traugott has authored 132 papers receiving a total of 4.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 77 papers in Ecology, 70 papers in Insect Science and 51 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Michael Traugott's work include Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (50 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (49 papers) and Plant and animal studies (32 papers). Michael Traugott is often cited by papers focused on Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (50 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (49 papers) and Plant and animal studies (32 papers). Michael Traugott collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Canada. Michael Traugott's co-authors include Anita Juen, William O. C. Symondson, Daniela Sint, R. Andrew King, Daniel S. Read, Corinna Wallinger, Karin Staudacher, Bettina Thalinger, Nikolaus Schallhart and Wolfgang Donsbach and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Michael Traugott

128 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Hit Papers

INVITED REVIEW: Molecular analysis of predation: a review... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Traugott Austria 40 2.3k 2.1k 1.5k 1.4k 962 132 4.7k
Pavel Kindlmann Czechia 34 1.2k 0.5× 1.6k 0.8× 2.5k 1.6× 556 0.4× 1.6k 1.7× 183 4.4k
Marc Kenis Switzerland 43 3.0k 1.3× 4.9k 2.4× 2.4k 1.6× 1.1k 0.7× 2.2k 2.2× 214 7.5k
William E. Snyder United States 41 1.4k 0.6× 3.7k 1.8× 2.9k 1.9× 566 0.4× 2.3k 2.4× 147 6.2k
John E. Losey United States 25 759 0.3× 2.6k 1.3× 2.2k 1.5× 573 0.4× 1.5k 1.6× 79 4.3k
Matthew J.W. Cock United Kingdom 25 804 0.3× 2.5k 1.2× 996 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 1.6k 1.6× 141 3.8k
Michael F. Antolin United States 38 1.7k 0.7× 1.6k 0.7× 1.4k 0.9× 722 0.5× 850 0.9× 116 5.2k
Ruth A. Hufbauer United States 36 1.4k 0.6× 1.6k 0.8× 2.0k 1.3× 424 0.3× 1.7k 1.8× 115 4.8k
George Roderick United States 47 2.2k 1.0× 3.7k 1.8× 2.7k 1.8× 1.3k 0.9× 1.6k 1.7× 121 7.7k
Paul J. De Barro Australia 40 980 0.4× 5.2k 2.5× 1.7k 1.1× 844 0.6× 3.4k 3.6× 96 6.8k
Nicholas J. Mills United States 43 1.1k 0.5× 4.0k 1.9× 2.3k 1.5× 498 0.3× 1.6k 1.7× 178 4.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Traugott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Traugott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Traugott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Traugott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Traugott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Traugott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Traugott. The network helps show where Michael Traugott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Traugott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Traugott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Traugott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Traugott. Michael Traugott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chatelain, Marion, et al.. (2025). Urbanisation and habitat shape resource-driven dietary shifts in wild birds. Landscape and Urban Planning. 268. 105552–105552.
2.
Rodriguez, Lauren, Caterina Lanfredi, Maddalena Jahoda, et al.. (2025). Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours. Environmental DNA. 7(3). 3 indexed citations
3.
Traugott, Michael, et al.. (2025). OlfactionROOM: An optimised, low‐cost olfactometer and easy‐to‐apply setup to mitigate the escape behaviour of insects. Ecological Entomology. 50(4). 609–617. 1 indexed citations
4.
Staudacher, Karin, et al.. (2024). Prey Switching and Natural Pest Control Potential of Carabid Communities over the Winter Wheat Cropping Season. Insects. 15(8). 610–610. 2 indexed citations
5.
Grabenweger, Giselher, et al.. (2024). Trap crops enhance the control efficacy of Metarhizium brunneum against a soil-dwelling pest. Journal of Pest Science. 97(3). 1633–1645. 5 indexed citations
6.
Bohan, David A., et al.. (2023). Consumer identity but not food availability affects carabid diet in cereal crops. Journal of Pest Science. 97(1). 281–296. 6 indexed citations
7.
Wallinger, Corinna, et al.. (2023). Secondary predation by omnivores: Cereal aphid consumption bears no risk of misinterpretation in DNA‐based diet analysis. Journal of Applied Entomology. 147(5). 356–360. 3 indexed citations
9.
Wallinger, Corinna, et al.. (2021). The amount of environmental DNA increases with freshwater crayfish density and over time. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 4. 1 indexed citations
10.
Thalinger, Bettina, et al.. (2020). Lateral and longitudinal fish environmental DNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats. Environmental DNA. 3(1). 305–318. 41 indexed citations
11.
Kamenova, Stefaniya, et al.. (2018). Comparing three types of dietary samples for prey DNA decay in an insect generalist predator. Molecular Ecology Resources. 18(5). 966–973. 35 indexed citations
12.
Roslin, Tomas, Michael Traugott, Mattias Jonsson, et al.. (2018). Introduction: Special issue on species interactions, ecological networks and community dynamics – Untangling the entangled bank using molecular techniques. Molecular Ecology. 28(2). 157–164. 12 indexed citations
13.
Staudacher, Karin, Mattias Jonsson, & Michael Traugott. (2015). Diagnostic PCR assays to unravel food web interactions in cereal crops with focus on biological control of aphids. Journal of Pest Science. 89(1). 281–293. 46 indexed citations
14.
Staudacher, Karin, Nikolaus Schallhart, Bettina Thalinger, et al.. (2013). Plant diversity affects behavior of generalist root herbivores, reduces crop damage, and enhances crop yield. Ecological Applications. 23(5). 1135–1145. 44 indexed citations
15.
Wallinger, Corinna, et al.. (2012). The effect of plant identity and the level of plant decay on molecular gut content analysis in a herbivorous soil insect. Molecular Ecology Resources. 13(1). 75–83. 44 indexed citations
16.
Staudacher, Karin, et al.. (2011). Occurrence of Agriotes wireworms in Austrian agricultural land. Journal of Pest Science. 86(1). 33–39. 29 indexed citations
17.
Traugott, Michael, et al.. (2011). Generalist predators disrupt parasitoid aphid control by direct and coincidental intraguild predation. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 102(2). 239–247. 81 indexed citations
18.
Juen, Anita, et al.. (2011). Molecular scatology: how to improve prey DNA detection success in avian faeces?. Molecular Ecology Resources. 11(4). 620–628. 98 indexed citations
19.
Sint, Daniela, et al.. (2011). Optimizing methods for PCR‐based analysis of predation. Molecular Ecology Resources. 11(5). 795–801. 58 indexed citations
20.
Volkmar, Christa, et al.. (2007). Spider communities in Bt maize and conventional maize fields. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026