Michael T. Mock

42 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Michael T. Mock
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 528
  • Catalysis 566
  • Inorganic Chemistry 792
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 791
  • Organic Chemistry 600
Replace Eric S. Wiedner with:
Eric S. Wiedner United States
Brian G. Hashiguchi United States
Nobuko Onozawa‐Komatsuzaki Japan
Nils Rockstroh Germany
Iván Sorribes Spain
Marcus W. Drover Canada
Caroline T. Saouma United States
Lingjing Chen China
Jesús Campos Spain
Kamaluddin Abdur‐Rashid Canada
Michael T. Mock relative to Eric S. Wiedner United States Eric S. Wiedner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eric S. Wiedner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael T. Mock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael T. Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael T. Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael T. Mock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael T. Mock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael T. Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael T. Mock. The network helps show where Michael T. Mock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael T. Mock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael T. Mock Line = papers co-authored together Michael T. Mock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013344
2 201498
3 200995
4 201889
5 201376
6 201973
7 201770
8 201764
9 201363
10 201157
11 201751
12 200847
13 201145
14 201641
15 201928
16 201228
17 202028
18 201426
19 202225
20 201525

About Michael T. Mock

Michael T. Mock is a scholar working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Catalysis, Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins (18 papers), Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction (18 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (12 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (12 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (7 papers), CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (7 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (7 papers) and Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (528 citations), Catalysis (566 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (792 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (791 citations) and Organic Chemistry (600 citations). Michael T. Mock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Aaron M. Appel, Matthew S. Jeletic, John C. Linehan, R. Morris Bullock, W. Scott Kassel, William G. Dougherty, Alexander J. Kendall, Papri Bhattacharya, Samantha I. Johnson and Monte L. Helm. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Inorganic Chemistry, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, Chemical Communications and Inorganica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact