Michael Stauske
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
-
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Papers in
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 5
- Ion channel regulation and function 3
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 3
- Surgery 4
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 4
- Co-authors
- Kaomei Guan (5 shared papers)Gerd Hasenfuß (4 shared papers)Malte Tiburcy (3 shared papers)Lukas Cyganek (3 shared papers)Wolfram‐Hubertus Zimmermann (2 shared papers)Gabriela Salinas (1 shared paper)Karolina Sekeres (1 shared paper)Christof Lenz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (1 paper)Cells (1 paper)Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology (1 paper)European Heart Journal (1 paper)JCI Insight (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Michael Stauske
8 papers receiving 408 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 131
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 142
- Molecular Biology 336
- Surgery 115
- Biomaterials 26
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stauske
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stauske's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stauske with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stauske more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stauske
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stauske. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stauske. The network helps show where Michael Stauske may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stauske, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 129 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 1 |
About Michael Stauske
Michael Stauske is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (131 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (142 citations), Molecular Biology (336 citations), Surgery (115 citations) and Biomaterials (26 citations). Michael Stauske has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Kaomei Guan, Gerd Hasenfuß, Malte Tiburcy, Lukas Cyganek, Wolfram‐Hubertus Zimmermann, Gabriela Salinas, Karolina Sekeres, Christof Lenz, Hanibal Bohnenberger and Ralf Dressel. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Cells, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, European Heart Journal and JCI Insight.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.