Michael Stastny

1.5k total citations
20 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Michael Stastny is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Stastny has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Ecology, 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 9 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Michael Stastny's work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). Michael Stastny is often cited by papers focused on Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). Michael Stastny collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. Michael Stastny's co-authors include Stig Larsson, Andrea Battisti, Alain Roques, Christelle Robinet, Axel Schopf, Sigrid Netherer, Elizabeth Elle, Urs Schaffner, Risa D. Sargent and John H. Borden and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, The Science of The Total Environment and Global Change Biology.

In The Last Decade

Michael Stastny

18 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Stastny Canada 11 672 643 416 268 193 20 1.1k
Inge van Halder France 21 570 0.8× 673 1.0× 378 0.9× 645 2.4× 187 1.0× 50 1.3k
Ingrid Kleinbauer Austria 11 383 0.6× 425 0.7× 220 0.5× 541 2.0× 261 1.4× 14 1.0k
Hervé Jactel France 20 581 0.9× 855 1.3× 617 1.5× 626 2.3× 334 1.7× 32 1.7k
Kimmo Saarinen Finland 20 772 1.1× 363 0.6× 154 0.4× 772 2.9× 251 1.3× 40 1.4k
Pekka Kaitaniemi Finland 26 767 1.1× 758 1.2× 565 1.4× 922 3.4× 428 2.2× 58 1.8k
Alison F. Hunter United States 11 488 0.7× 442 0.7× 251 0.6× 383 1.4× 188 1.0× 13 966
Mark McKone United States 19 591 0.9× 399 0.6× 129 0.3× 476 1.8× 288 1.5× 41 1.0k
György Csóka Hungary 24 1.2k 1.7× 757 1.2× 902 2.2× 314 1.2× 216 1.1× 83 1.8k
Brice Giffard France 18 492 0.7× 424 0.7× 378 0.9× 450 1.7× 274 1.4× 33 945
Shin Abe Japan 18 282 0.4× 452 0.7× 174 0.4× 514 1.9× 285 1.5× 47 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stastny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stastny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stastny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stastny more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stastny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stastny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stastny. The network helps show where Michael Stastny may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Stastny

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Stastny. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Stastny based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Stastny. Michael Stastny is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Kidd, Karen A., et al.. (2024). Response of stream habitat and microbiomes to spruce budworm defoliation: New considerations for outbreak management. Ecological Applications. 34(7). e3020–e3020. 6 indexed citations
3.
Stastny, Michael, Juan C. Corley, & Jeremy D. Allison. (2024). Regional adaptation of integrated pest management to control invasive forest insects. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 23(5).
4.
Kidd, Karen A., et al.. (2024). Effects of spruce budworm defoliation on in-stream algal production and carbon use by food webs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 81(6). 731–746. 3 indexed citations
5.
Kidd, Karen A., Erik J. S. Emilson, Michael Stastny, et al.. (2023). Increasing spruce budworm defoliation increases catchment discharge in conifer forests. The Science of The Total Environment. 912. 168561–168561. 6 indexed citations
6.
Moise, Eric R.D., Joseph J. Bowden, & Michael Stastny. (2023). Suboptimal host tree benefits the overwintering of a destructive forest insect pest. Basic and Applied Ecology. 71. 72–84. 2 indexed citations
7.
Stastny, Michael, et al.. (2020). No evidence that rapid adaptation impedes biological control of an invasive plant. Evolutionary Applications. 13(9). 2472–2483. 2 indexed citations
8.
Johns, Rob, Joseph J. Bowden, Barry J. Cooke, et al.. (2019). A Conceptual Framework for the Spruce Budworm Early Intervention Strategy: Can Outbreaks be Stopped?. Forests. 10(10). 910–910. 49 indexed citations
9.
Stastny, Michael, et al.. (2019). The impacts of biological control on the performance of Lythrum salicaria 20 years post-release. Biological Control. 140. 104123–104123. 3 indexed citations
10.
Emilson, Caroline E. & Michael Stastny. (2019). A decision framework for hemlock woolly adelgid management: Review of the most suitable strategies and tactics for eastern Canada. Forest Ecology and Management. 444. 327–343. 7 indexed citations
11.
Stastny, Michael & Risa D. Sargent. (2017). Evidence for rapid evolutionary change in an invasive plant in response to biological control. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 30(5). 1042–1052. 25 indexed citations
12.
Campbell, S. & Michael Stastny. (2014). Benefits of gregarious feeding by aposematic caterpillars depend on group age structure. Oecologia. 177(3). 715–721. 14 indexed citations
13.
Stastny, Michael & Anurag A. Agrawal. (2014). Love thy neighbor? reciprocal impacts between plant community structure and insect herbivory in co‐occurring Asteraceae. Ecology. 95(10). 2904–2914. 17 indexed citations
14.
Stastny, Michael, et al.. (2008). ECOLOGICAL COSTS ON LOCAL ADAPTATION OF AN INSECT HERBIVORE IMPOSED BY HOST PLANTS AND ENEMIES. Ecology. 89(5). 1388–1398. 54 indexed citations
15.
Battisti, Andrea, et al.. (2007). Temperature as a predictor of survival of the pine processionary moth in the Italian Alps. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 9(1). 65–72. 56 indexed citations
16.
Battisti, Andrea, et al.. (2006). A rapid altitudinal range expansion in the pine processionary moth produced by the 2003 climatic anomaly. Global Change Biology. 12(4). 662–671. 188 indexed citations
17.
Stastny, Michael, et al.. (2006). Host‐plant use in the range expansion of the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa. Ecological Entomology. 31(5). 481–490. 59 indexed citations
18.
Battisti, Andrea, Michael Stastny, Sigrid Netherer, et al.. (2005). EXPANSION OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE IN THE PINE PROCESSIONARY MOTH CAUSED BY INCREASED WINTER TEMPERATURES. Ecological Applications. 15(6). 2084–2096. 440 indexed citations
19.
Stastny, Michael, Urs Schaffner, & Elizabeth Elle. (2004). Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness?. Journal of Ecology. 93(1). 27–37. 141 indexed citations
20.
Huber, Dezene P.W., John H. Borden, & Michael Stastny. (2001). Response of the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to conophthorin and other angiosperm bark volatiles in the avoidance of non‐hosts. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 3(3). 225–232. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026